Project Manager and Computer Science Engineer Talk while Using Big Screen Display and a Laptop

Justice information systems modernization, reimagined

Co-author: Paul Wormeli, Contractor, Ernst & Young LLP

By modernizing data-sharing and integration, agencies can better connect the dots across the criminal justice system.


In today’s fast-paced, tech-driven world, dealing with lengthy manual processes is frustrating and oftentimes unnecessary. Yet many criminal justice processes are not streamlined and remain unautomated due to their complex workflows and interdependent nature. State and local justice systems often rely on outdated technology, fragmented data and disjointed software systems, hindering automation efforts. This fragmentation causes data accessibility issues, making collaboration among justice partners difficult. Outdated systems also pose security risks and entail a high cost of ownership.

Objectives driving justice systems modernization

  • Operational efficiency: Streamlining workflows and data sharing across justice partners to meet time standards for case processing.
  • Actionable intelligence: Rapidly connecting persons, cases and evidence data to provide actionable business intelligence.
  • Data driven policy-making: Providing high-quality data for identification of disparities, transparency and data-informed policy decisions.
  • Collaboration: Enabling justice agencies to work with public health, human services and education sectors to address contributing factors to justice outcomes.
  • Improved security posture: Implementing robust security controls, data protection and automated patching mechanisms.

Challenges in justice systems modernization

  • Disconnected landscape: The justice ecosystem includes 27 federal agencies, multiple state agencies and 3,000 counties, each with its own technology and operations, making data sharing, process automation and interagency collaboration difficult.
  • Historical data management: Criminal justice systems must handle data spanning several generations, requiring the conversion or integration of decades-old records.
  • High data complexity: Charges in a case can change multiple times, and court documents have complex structures. Investigators and attorneys must go through vast volumes of audio and video data, which can benefit from high-fidelity AI processing.
  • Complex data separation requirements: Legal requirements mandate the separation of data between district attorneys and public defenders, juvenile and adult offender data and highly protected investigation data.
  • Compliance: Systems must meet Federal Criminal Justice Information System (CJIS) security requirements and receive an Authority to Operate (ATO).

To learn more about how you can use our platform to solve your modernization challenges, please download our whitepaper here.

Download our whitepaper to learn how you can use our Unified Justice Platform to address your modernization challenges

Summary 

State and local justice systems often rely on outdated technology, fragmented data and disjointed software systems, hindering data sharing and process automation. Contact our team to learn how justice agencies connect the dots across the criminal justice continuum, and drive operational efficiency, actionable intelligence and improved security posture. 

About this article

You are visiting EY us (en)
us en