EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Learn how the EY-Pegasystems Alliance helps businesses achieve ultimate outcomes through a combination of intelligent process automation and business insights.
Read more
Historically, organizations have found themselves in a vicious cycle of transformation. Significant investment, resourcing and time is exhausted, creating new or wholly revised applications that bring the business in line with current trends, regulations and client expectations. But the torrent of these dynamics seemingly only increases with speed and ferocity. Often, organizations are still realizing ROI on solutions that are already approaching obsolescence. Thus, we realize the all too common disjointed and disparate technology infrastructure: Complex processes, various data stores, legacy apps, off-the-shelf solutions and maybe a macro or two try to communicate and coordinate. Sometimes, if they’re lucky, they’ll execute cohesively.
When we speak with potential clients, the above story is often repeated to strikingly similar degrees. And why wouldn’t it be? The titans of Silicon Valley continue to outduel one another on innovation and engagement, spending billions of dollars annually on R&D.
As these applications reach the general public, our collective expectation skews to faster response times, better user experiences, exacting predictions and sweeping integrations. But the vast majority of organizations worldwide need time, energy and funds to keep up. The typical transformation lifecycle is lengthy and often includes requirement elaboration, platform decision, service partnerships, design elaborations, resource allocation, iterative development, various levels of testing, defect remediation, deployment, post-go-live modification and end user training.
All of this must happen before a modicum of investment can be returned. And as a result, so many clients choose not to invest in such extensive redesigns not for lack of urgency, will or alignment but sheerly due to cost. The question most organizations face isn’t about how to stay ahead of the curve, but how long they can afford to fall behind.
It is therefore no surprise that demand for the agility and scalability of low-code/no-code (LCNC) platforms continues to rise. LCNC development platforms enable smaller and more efficient enhancements to be faster and cheaper, while also encouraging initiative validation via proofs of concept. Businesses can move forward on the transformation journey with greater speed, while still maintaining quality and security standards. Gartner predicts that by 2025, low-code development will account for more than 70% of application development activity, up from 20% in 2020.
LCNC development by its nature limits the need for development talent, placing greater emphasis on business resources, which enables the organization to tap into a wellspring of unexplored, creative ideas. Business users with little to no coding skills can create applications that quickly deliver value. The technical team, which is normally overwhelmed with requests, is then free to engage in high-value and more complex initiatives. Furthermore, many of these LCNC platforms have placed an impetus on plug-and-play integration application programming interfaces (APIs) and artificial intelligence (AI) tools, making them even more powerful, accessible and efficient.
By democratizing technology innovation across all resources, organizations can not only vastly improve their technological relevancy but also encourage creative and pioneering ideas to differentiate themselves in the marketplace.