Clarifying the EV equation from abstraction into action

As the pressures from climate change continue to intensify, electric vehicles (EVs) present an intricate balance of opportunity and complexity for companies with large corporate fleets. For one US telco with about 25,000 service vehicles, the equation to determine the return on investment was especially difficult.

Replacing their existing fleet of gas-engine vehicles with EVs would go a long way toward meeting the company’s emissions-reduction commitments. And to some extent, the economics supported making the change. Further, governments are adding urgency through regulations and incentives: the US and Canada have targeted 2040 for all their commercial trucks to become electric. And automakers are coming out with dozens of EVs over the next decade — while eventually phasing out gas-engine vehicles altogether. The cost of EV batteries continues to plummet, and EVs require much less money to maintain (as there are no oil changes, for example). One executive who upgraded his company’s fleet said that the cost savings per vehicle totaled about $10,000 to $12,000 per year thanks to fuel and maintenance savings, in an article for The New York Times.¹

As the pressures from climate change continue to intensify, electric vehicles (EVs) present an intricate balance of opportunity and complexity for companies with large corporate fleets. For one US telco with about 25,000 service vehicles, the equation to determine the return on investment was especially difficult.

Replacing their existing fleet of gas-engine vehicles with EVs would go a long way toward meeting the company’s emissions-reduction commitments. And to some extent, the economics supported making the change. Further, governments are adding urgency through regulations and incentives: the US and Canada have targeted 2040 for all their commercial trucks to become electric. And automakers are coming out with dozens of EVs over the next decade — while eventually phasing out gas-engine vehicles altogether. The cost of EV batteries continues to plummet, and EVs require much less money to maintain (as there are no oil changes, for example). One executive who upgraded his company’s fleet said that the cost savings per vehicle totaled about $10,000 to $12,000 per year thanks to fuel and maintenance savings, in an article for The New York Times.1

Working closely together, the client and EY US began shaping an EV implementation strategy based on actual numbers. We developed a customizable, spreadsheet-based model for assessing and optimizing the financial and operational levers of the client’s fleet electrification strategy. But with the variables constantly changing, just a onetime snapshot would not be helpful. Instead, our decision-support model enables key inputs to be customized on an ongoing basis to analyze additional geographies and account for evolving data and assumptions.

Through that model, EY US provided the client with insights from across the nation, with inputs from sector-specific resources — including those in power and utilities, automotive, real estate, the public sector and others — that each hold a piece of the puzzle when it comes to understanding this once-in-a-generation transformation.

The analysis would assess operational and financial factors to determine the best-fit EV charging strategy for each geography and its workers, and calculate an associated total cost per vehicle. But what would work best — charging at the drivers’ homes, at depots or through publicly available fast charging? EY US first assessed the operational feasibility of the transition before the financial implications. Leveraging its fleet transition playbook, our team crunched the numbers, incorporating data from a subset of about 1,000 technicians and accounting for:

• Home address, type (such as a single-family home or an apartment) and parking space availability
• Distance to existing owned real estate or the closest public charger
• Feasibility of upgrading existing real estate to charging depots (e.g., parking space availability, electrical upgrade feasibility, ability to procure additional land)
• Current employee garaging approach
• Average daily mileage demand

In the financial feasibility analysis, we considered the cost of the required EV charging equipment; installation of that equipment when needed, including electrical upgrades and permits; electricity consumption; and the potential loss of employee productivity, such as the traveling distance and time spent waiting for a charge. Depots were further scrutinized as an option, considering the cost of additional land procurement, if needed, as well as electrical upgrades to support depot-based charging for the target fleet electrification goal for each depot location. We also considered applicable government and utility incentives; change management costs for training and incentive programs; and the potential impact of employee attrition, including the risk of stranded assets.

“To operationalize sustainability, we have to find tools to speak to that team,” the client’s sustainability leader said about the challenge of engaging the organization. “When we get into a statement of work, we think we know what we want, and we think we’ve identified how to play it out, but we weren’t coming up with the tool.”

EY US provided the tool to transform climate abstractions and evolving strategies into reality, based on concrete data. We helped them figure out how much to rely on themselves or wait for public infrastructure, and where a change would make the most sense geographically — to meet interim goals without overextending themselves financially.

“EY US was willing to spend the extra time,” the executive said. “They asked: ‘What is it that you need? How can I show you this data? What tools do you need to get where you need to go?’ That helped get us to the outcome that we thought we had clearly defined.”

Based on its analysis and discussions with executives, and drawing from the strength of its global network, EY US established a clear vehicle-charging strategy approach so that electrification targets would be met while optimizing for non-interrupted operations and cost — ready to be implemented when the client is ready to move forward.

And through our customizable EV decision-support model, the client is equipped and trained for ongoing analysis to perform on its own. In just six weeks, the client now has an informed roadmap not just for the first six months in its journey but far beyond, in three stages.

Beyond the actual deliverables, EY US provided the broader thinking to connect concrete actions with desired outcomes — informed by data — whatever the client’s ultimate next step may be.

“You understand the language, you understand the data and you understand the players,” the client’s sustainability leader said of EY US. “And I know you’re willing to team with me to get to the end state even if we’re not the best at articulating what that end state might be. That’s been really critical to our success.”