As attrition rises, succession planning is becoming more important than ever, yet many organizations face these CFO transitions unprepared. Many appoint an interim CFO during a transition to bridge the gap until a full-time successor is found. In fact, the number of interim CFO hirings per year has almost doubled in the last decade in Fortune 250 CFO transitions, with less than a third of those interim CFOs moving into a permanent designation in the company. As a result, many of these companies end up managing two CFO transitions in less than a year, intensifying instability.
The combination of shorter tenures, higher attrition and an increase in the appointment of temporary CFOs is not a recipe for long-term success for any organization. For most, this churn may inhibit the stability required for growth and lead to lower total shareholder returns. Correlation does not imply causation, but organizations must consider the impact that shorter CFO tenures have on their strategic progress, operational execution and financial results. The data shows that longer-term CFOs (defined here as those that have been in their role for at least six years) have delivered average excess total shareholder return¹ (ETSR) that is 2.75 times higher than those CFOs with shorter tenures (in role for one to three years).
Developing a CFO requires more effort but also yields higher organizational return
The trajectory of rising attrition and declining CFO tenure on organizations is further exacerbated by the increasing challenges associated with hiring or developing CFOs, which can be complicated and time-intensive due to the complexity of the evolving role.
CFOs are no longer solely financial leaders and technical experts, but key business and operations leaders involved in far more complex and cross-functional projects, including business transformation, digital initiatives and addressing critical business challenges such as major market disruptions and investor activism. EY analysis of Fortune 250 CFOs shows a number of critical areas where CFOs are taking a broader, more involved leadership role:
- Corporate strategy, including cross-company business transformation and restructuring: Most CFOs play a critical role in strategy development, restructuring initiatives, business transformations or cost-reduction initiatives. And as this type of effort continues to increase, so does the requirement for more strategic and dynamic CFOs. Data shows that recent CFOs are 3.5 times more likely to get involved in a restructuring initiative by year three of their tenure compared to the previous decade (2001-2010). Restructuring initiatives on their own can create instability for an organization, but combining that with rising CFO attrition could further destabilize a company if not properly managed.
- Transformative digital initiatives: CFO involvement in digital initiatives has increased steadily over the last decade given the increasing impact of these capabilities across many sectors. Of the total digital initiatives implemented by Fortune 250 companies in the last 20 years, ~70% were implemented in the last 10 years or so, reflecting the accelerated pace of technological change. In more recent years (2016-present), that acceleration has continued, with 36% of digital initiatives implemented, including organizational transitions to cloud infrastructure and computing. As generative AI and data analytics emerge as transformational themes for the future, CFOs will play an even bigger role in complex digital initiatives, requiring them to master their digital understanding to ensure that these investments capture strategic growth opportunities and deliver clear returns across the enterprise.
- Investor activism: Data shows that investor activism in organizations has sharply increased. From 2001-2015, an average of 21% of CFOs experienced some level of activist investor exposure compared to 2016-present, where the number of CFOs experiencing investor activism more than tripled. CFOs are also now facing investor activism pressure earlier in their tenure than the previous decade. This type of pressure early in a CFO’s tenure requires CFOs to exude confidence, display superb communication skills and demonstrate a solid understanding of the organization’s value proposition to respond quickly and effectively to activists.
As a result, organizations are hiring CFOs with broader experiences, including recruiting executives with strategy, investor relations or other functional leadership backgrounds beyond the more traditional CFO disciplines of accounting, reporting, treasury and planning. Of those CFOs appointed from 2001-2010, the ratio of executives appointed directly from the role of controller or treasurer compared to those appointed directly from the role of business unit (BU) CFO or Investor Relations (IR) was 4:1. In other words, for every BU CFO or IR executive appointed as corporate CFO during that time frame, there were four controllers or treasurers appointed as CFO (Figure 2). From 2011-2023, this trend reversed, and appointing a BU CFO or head of IR as corporate CFO is now equally as common as appointing a CFO from a more traditional background such as controller or treasurer.
Figure 2: Percentage of CFO appointments following immediately previous role