While stakeholders obtain information and insights to make informed M&A decisions, historically, global trade and VAT functions have not been consistently included in due diligence. The oversight may be due to a lack of understanding of global trade and VAT mechanics or the target’s desire to maintain confidentiality. Often for trade in particular, where the trade team is embedded in a function such as supply chain, there may be a disconnect with tax and legal groups who drive the due diligence process and therefore, trade topics are overlooked.
Many times, VAT and trade topics are not considered until an audit, investigation or penalty. As a result, when trade and VAT topics are not incorporated into the diligence process and the target has import, export and/or VAT activities, significant risks may go undetected, and depending on the life sciences company’s size, scope and complexity, risks can rise to the level of materiality. The deal price can also be impacted by global trade and VAT risks identified during due diligence, which is then subject to negotiations between the parties.
While life sciences companies often have lower or even duty-free treatment for many of their products, some products do attract duties, which are often mitigated through the application of free trade agreements (FTAs) or duty mitigation programs such as foreign trade zones, duty drawback or inward/outward processing regimes. Trade risks can be material when duty-free claims under an FTA are unsupported or where duty mitigation programs have been used without appropriate controls. In recent years, the trade disputes between the US and China have resulted in punitive duties up to 25%, which if not paid, can quickly result in material amounts. Similarly, the war in Ukraine has resulted in the imposition of export-related restrictions by the US, UK and European Union countries; when not correctly adhered to, they can result in violations and even loss of export privileges. While exceptions often apply to life sciences companies that allow the continued ability to transact with Russia, the frequent changes in the rules have resulted in additional risk of potential non compliance.
Similarly, VAT risks can also rise to materiality when there is an incorrect VAT treatment applied on raw materials, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), drug substance and drug products at any stage of the supply chain of a potential target. This can result in underpaid VAT, interest and penalties due to tax authorities. Such risk can have an impact on the sell side and the buy side.
On the buy side, VAT and trade risks may include successor liabilities for historical exposures and a higher purchase price if not identified during due diligence.
On the sell side, VAT and trade risks may result in the seller having to negotiate a lower sales price to reflect the potential historical exposure identified and/or the inclusion of warranties and indemnities in the sales agreement.
Consequently, the target’s global trade and VAT profile should be evaluated at the onset of the diligence process and the below topics should be embedded throughout the due diligence process.