EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Our tax accounting and risk advisory services professionals can help your business with all aspects of financial reporting for tax. Learn more.
Read more
Results from the EY 2023 Tax Accounting Executives Survey (the Survey) show that companies are evolving their tax accounting functions to address new tax challenges, but more and faster adaptation is needed to overcome, if not stay ahead of, these challenges. The Survey highlights companies’ current tax accounting priorities, as well as the growing role of data, technology, artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics in improving accuracy and decision-making and in creating the kinds of efficiencies critical to success in the months and years ahead. This article highlights several focus areas for businesses to consider, as well as some market-leading practices based on EY analysis.
Understanding and addressing today’s tax accounting challenges
Ongoing regulatory changes continue to put pressure on tax accounting — consider:
- The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is drafting an Accounting Standards Update, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which will expand considerably tax disclosures, requiring compilation of additional data points and implementation of new processes and controls.
- Multiple sustainability/environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure standards (Global Reporting Initiative, World Economic Forum, etc.) include tax matters (e.g., country-by-country reporting (CbCR), total tax paid and the company’s tax strategy statements) in transparency reporting.
- The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) has introduced a new complex global minimum tax system with significant new data and technology requirements for multinational companies with revenues of EUR750 million or more.
- The European Union public CbCR directive, also applicable to multinational companies with revenues of EUR750 million or more, requires companies to prepare public CbCR to enhance transparency on tax matters.
It is no wonder that nearly half of the respondents to the 2023 EY Tax and Finance Operations Survey, which took the pulse of 1,600 tax and finance professionals across 32 jurisdictions and 18 industries, said the lack of a sustainable plan for data and technology is the biggest barrier to achieving their vision for a modern tax and finance function. A recent EY article details how tax complexity, real-time data demands and talent challenges are impacting today’s tax departments and discusses how data and technology can help transform an organization’s tax department.
All these challenges are even more acute for the tax accounting function, which commonly faces short close timelines; inconsistent and redundant data issues; and increased scope, quality and precision expectations from audit committees and boards of directors. In today’s complex regulatory and resource-constrained tax environment, automation, centralized and coordinated data, and analytics are essential to improving tax accounting efficiencies.
The case for centralized data and analytics
As new regulatory requirements come online, it is increasingly clear that digital tax reporting is providing local taxing authorities with increased access to organizations’ data, resulting in more targeted tax examination efforts. Accordingly, the tax accounting function must have access to consistent, timely, complete, accurate data that can be used, reused and integrated into a variety of reporting requirements and calculations.
Data risks may be further exacerbated as pressure increases to shorten the financial reporting close timeline, i.e., the time the accounting team has available to finalize tax provision calculations and prepare the financial statements for a particular period. As noted in the Survey, nearly half of respondents expect close timelines to be shorter. Companies with complex accounting structures, large volumes of transactions or a multitude of subsidiaries have inherently more data risks.
Additionally, many Survey respondents say they are currently spending too much time on tax provision preparation and review. Executives responding estimated that their tax provision teams were spending approximately 50% of their time on preparation versus 38% ideal. Similarly, Survey respondents expected their tax provision teams to spend around 33% of their time reviewing tax provisions while the actual estimate time is 38%.