Decline of global influence: a diminishing role in global affairs, loss of diplomatic power

Treatment of US multinational IP transfers in a Pillar Two world

US multinational enterprises face complexities when managing IP transactions under the new Pillar Two global tax framework.


A company’s intangible property (IP) is often its most valuable asset, driving economic growth and business success. US multinational enterprises (MNEs) frequently engage in transactions that involve IP, including acquisitions, dispositions and restructurings, to help manage this key asset efficiently from business and tax perspectives.

In an article first published in Tax Notes Today International, Jason Yen, a Principal in Ernst & Young LLP’s National Tax Department in Washington DC, and Ernst & Young LLP Senior Manager Bona Chung explore some of the complexities that can arise when applying Pillar Two’s global anti-base erosion (GloBE) rules to various IP transactions.

IP transactions require careful analysis from both US federal income tax and foreign tax perspectives. Generally accepted accounting principles and local statutory accounting consequences must also be considered. While tax and accounting professionals often are accustomed to dealing with these topics, Pillar Two has introduced a new dimension to the analysis of IP transactions, with rules spread across various guidance and treatment heavily influenced by a transaction’s timing. These complexities make it critical for US MNEs to understand the Pillar Two implications of both domestic and cross-border IP transactions.

 

In their article, Yen and Chung provide an overview of the relevant aspects of the GloBE rules and highlight some common fact patterns around IP transactions, examining how each transaction might be treated for GloBE purposes and noting areas of complexity and unanswered questions that would benefit from additional clarity.

Download the full article

Summary 

There are numerous complexities and tax implications of IP transactions under the new Pillar Two global tax framework. There is a need for more detailed guidance on treatment of M&A-related transactions due to their common occurrence and significant impact on US MNEs.

About this article

Related articles

How a mobile workforce is shaping Pillar Two compliance

Explore the impact of remote work on Pillar Two compliance. Learn how to manage tax complexities. Read now.

How to find certainty amid tax policy transformation

EY 2024 Tax Policy and Controversy Outlook explores what you should act on now and what you should keep an eye on next. Learn more.

BEPS 2.0: as policies evolve, engagement is key

It remains to be seen whether the US will align its tax law with the OECD/G20’s global BEPS 2.0 rules. MNEs will feel the impact in 2024. Learn more.