The poll results of the audience show an overwhelming consensus that a combination of critical minerals is needed much more than individual minerals. Therefore, an integrated resource strategy is preferred. This shift in thinking is crucial for managing the complexities of the energy transition, as different minerals will play unique roles across various technologies, such as batteries, electric vehicles (EVs) and renewables.
While the long-term fundamentals for clean energy technologies and critical minerals remain robust, the sector must navigate a slowdown in demand driven by macroeconomic uncertainties, capital constraints faced by junior to mid-tier metals and mining companies, and policy instability — particularly in regions like the US, where mine development timelines average 29 years.2
Despite these challenges, panelists noted significant opportunities for investment in resources such as graphite, a priority mineral for Canada, to transform resources into viable reserves. To capitalize on this potential, coordinated efforts between governments and businesses are essential in building diversified supply chains beyond China. A holistic approach to resource development, coupled with strategic capital investment, will be crucial in supporting the broad range of technologies required for a sustainable future.
Investing in local mining and technological innovation is expected to strengthen the supply chain
The rise in geopolitical tensions, most notably the US-China trade conflict, has reinforced the need for localized supply chains to reduce dependency on international sources and mitigate supply disruptions. In addition, many countries are adopting local beneficiation policies, such as in Namibia, Guinea, Chile, Argentina, Zimbabwe, among others, which emphasize refining raw materials domestically to enhance economic value.3