The team implemented EY Grants Accelerator (EYGA), built on Microsoft’s low code/no code Power Platform, to quickly deploy an external-facing portal where directors could apply for relief funding on behalf of their instructors.
Responding to challenges
The original scope of work was to:
- Deploy an EYGA enabling application submission on the front end, an application review on the back end and a data extract for the payment provider.
- Train DEL users to perform day-to-day activities in EYGA.
- Provide EYGA technical support for bugs, defects and enhancements.
But when challenges arose within the client environment and the scope of work changed, the team responded in real time. Key concerns were:
- An accelerated timeline
- Heightened customer support
- Unreliable data
An accelerated timeline
The team was prepared to face a significant deadline challenge based on the project’s scope of work, which stated that applications should be available in the external facing portal, “if possible by July 1, 2021, but in no event later than July 14, 2021.” The July 14 deadline would give the team only four weeks. In the past, it had taken six to eight weeks to stand up EYGA.
The timeline shrank even further after DEL learned that the governor was adamant about a July 1 deadline. The team members pulled together, their workdays stretching into nights. Ultimately, they launched EYGA in 10 days. Cheryl Fang, engagement manager and EYGA go-to-market leader, called the achievement a testament to the EYGA core product team’s ability to add many features over the last year.
Heightened customer support
As part of support services, the team provided call center agents to handle inbound and outbound calls, a central email for users to obtain assistance and translation services. The team had been told that the instructor population wasn’t highly tech savvy, so they expected a high volume of calls. But the initial go-live resulted in even more inquiries than they had anticipated and became unmanageable for the call center team.
Fang and another senior manager, Amy Fenstermacher, stepped in to serve as resources on “tier two” matters, while their teammates focused on “tier one” technical aspects. “We would be talking with them every day to say, ‘How can we solve such-and-such issue quickly?’,” Fang says. The ongoing feedback enabled real-time adjustments to managing the program.
Unreliable data
The foundation of the team’s data was information imported from DEL’s source system as a spreadsheet. It listed provider facilities, directors, instructors and more. The team loaded the data so that in the application, when the director selected a facility, the instructors and their mailing addresses appeared.
“Things become outdated very quickly,” Fang says, “and there’s no mechanism to keep that information up to date.” The team had added more than 29,500 instructor records by the end of the first window of the project.
Many of the help desk interactions concerned specifics that took time. Despite the painstaking nature of the work, the team resolved nearly 50,000 email inquiries — more than 30,000 of those within the first three months.