EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Washington Council Ernst & Young (WCEY) is a tax, legislative and regulatory group within Ernst & Young LLP that combines the power of a leading professional services organization with the on-the-ground knowledge, personal relationships and attention to detail of a boutique Washington-insider firm.
Read more
The process
With the dust settling following the election, the main focus now is speculation over forthcoming negotiations among Republicans to decide on a revenue target for the bill, determining how much of the cost of the bill will be paid for and how much will be added to the budget deficit.
The process begins with each house passing a “budget resolution” setting parameters for revenues and/or spending for the fiscal year. If Congress intends to consider a reconciliation bill, the budget resolution will include “instructions” to committees of jurisdiction to change spending or revenue (or both) to meet specific targets. The reconciliation instructions cannot prescribe specific policies to achieve the number targets.
The budget resolution must be approved by the House and Senate in the same form but is not signed by the president.
Typically, budget resolutions are approved in advance of the upcoming fiscal year (a fiscal year 2025 budget resolution would be approved during calendar year 2024, for example). Importantly, a budget resolution for FY 2025 (which begins October 1, 2024) has not been considered by Congress this year. However, Congress may approve a budget resolution at any point during the fiscal year (prior to September 30, 2025), meaning this vehicle will be available to the new Congress taking office in January 2025. The new Congress will also be able to use an FY 2026 budget resolution to create a separate set of reconciliation instructions next year, providing a potential path for two reconciliation exercises in 2025.
Republican leaders are confirming that two separate budget reconciliation bills will be available for enacting GOP-only proposals with a simple majority vote in the Senate in the next Congress – they will hold a 53-vote majority next year – rather than the 60-vote filibuster threshold that would apply to a tax bill considered under divided government. Reportedly, one may focus on extending the TCJA tax cuts. The second may focus on proposals Trump put forth during his campaign.
Once a budget resolution with reconciliation instructions is approved, the committees that are given instructions begin putting together legislation to meet the targets. In addition to meeting the targets set out in the resolution, a reconciliation bill must meet very specific rules to preserve its status and avoid a Senate filibuster. These rules are called Byrd Rules after former Senator Robert C. Byrd (D-WV). For example, each provision in the bill must affect revenues or spending in some way. Provisions that do not must be removed. This can pose a problem for tax legislation because grants of regulatory authority generally do not carry a revenue score but help ensure that Treasury implements the legislation as Congress intends.
Another requirement is that a reconciliation bill must not worsen the deficit beyond the “budget window.” A budget resolution will specify this term, which is traditionally 10 years but could be shorter of longer if Congress wishes. One way that Congress meets this requirement of not worsening the deficit is to sunset tax cuts or to “pay for” tax cuts with other tax increases or spending cuts. The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts and the 2017 TCJA are well-known examples of tax cuts that were sunset to meet the reconciliation requirements.
In the Senate, debate is limited to 20 hours and all amendments must be relevant to the underlying provisions of the bill. The 20-hour time limit for debate, germaneness requirements, and prohibition on filibustering the bill, are key reasons why lawmakers are often inclined to use the process to move major legislation with revenue implications.