1 Reflects the expected lifecycle emissions of a project based on its carbon intensity (measured as kg of CO2e per kg of hydrogen produced).
2 Assumes labour requirements are met.
Note that for equipment that may be eligible for multiple tax credits, only one of the following credits can be claimed for that particular property:
- Clean hydrogen tax credit
- Clean electricity tax credit
- Clean technology manufacturing tax credit
- Clean technology investment tax credit
- Carbon capture, utilization and storage tax credit
However, multiple tax credits could be available for the same project if the project includes different types of eligible property.
Clean electricity investment tax credit
This new 15% refundable tax credit has been announced to support clean electricity technologies and proponents to expand the capacity of Canada’s clean electricity grid and accelerate our progress towards a net-zero grid.
The credit applies to eligible investments in both new and refurbishment projects relating to:
- Non-emitting electricity generation systems including wind, solar, hydro, wave, tidal and nuclear
- Abated natural gas-fired electricity generation (which would be subject to an emissions intensity threshold compatible with a net-zero grid by 2035)
- Stationary electricity storage systems that do not use fossil fuels in operation
- Equipment for the transmission of electricity between provinces and territories
This credit, estimated to cost a total of $25.7 billion over 12 years, would become available as of the day of Budget 2024 and would apply to projects that had not yet begun construction prior to 28 March 2023. The credit will not be available after 2034.
Similar to the clean hydrogen tax credit, certain labour requirements (see Labour requirements related to certain investment tax credits) must be met to receive the 15% rate. If these requirements are not met, the credit is reduced to by 10 percentage points. The clean electricity ITC could be claimed in addition to the Atlantic ITC, but generally not with any other ITC.
Other requirements for accessing the tax credit in each province and territory will include a commitment by a competent authority that the federal funding will be used to lower electricity bills and a commitment to achieve a net-zero electricity sector by 2035.
Labour requirements related to certain investment tax credits
Budget 2023 contains specific labour requirements that are attached to several ITCs, including the clean technology ITC and the clean hydrogen tax credit. To achieve the maximum tax credit rates, businesses must:
- Pay a total compensation package that equates to the prevailing wage. The definition of prevailing wage would be based on union compensation (including benefits and pension contributions) from the most recent, widely applicable multi-employer collective bargaining agreement or corresponding project labour agreements (in the relevant jurisdiction).
- Ensure at least 10% of the tradesperson hours worked must be performed by registered apprentices in the Red Seal trades.
These labour requirements would apply in respect of workers engaged in project elements that are subsidized by the respective ITC, either as employees of the business or indirectly employed by a contractor or subcontractor. These requirements would apply to workers whose duties are primarily manual or physical in nature, but not to workers who are primarily involved in administrative, clerical, supervisory or executive duties.
Investment tax credit for carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS)
Budget 2022 proposed a refundable CCUS tax credit for businesses that incur eligible expenses starting on 1 January 2022 (see EY Tax Alert 2022 Issue No. 31, Proposed federal investment tax credit for CCUS and EY Tax Alert 2022 Issue No. 41, Proposed federal investment tax credit for carbon capture, utilization and storage — update). Budget 2023 proposes that:
- Dual-use equipment that produces heat and/or power or uses water used for CCUS would be eligible for the tax credit provided it meets all other conditions for the CCUS tax credit. For dual-use equipment:
- The cost of the equipment would be eligible on a pro-rated basis proportional to the expected energy balance or material balance supporting the CCUS process over the first 20 years of the project.
- Power or heat production equipment would only be eligible if the energy balance is expected to be primarily used (i.e., more than 50%) to support the CCUS process or hydrogen production eligible for the ITC. For equipment producing both heat and power, only one heat or power energy balance would need to meet this requirement.
- British Columbia will be added to the list of eligible jurisdictions for dedicated geological storage for eligible expenses incurred after 1 January 2022.
- Rather than obtaining approval from Environment and Climate Change Canada, taxpayers would need to have their technology validated by a qualified third party to confirm that the process meets the minimum 60% mineralization requirement. The process for CO2 storage in concrete would be evaluated against the ISO 14034:2016 standard “Environmental management – Environmental technology verification.”
- A business would only be able to claim one of the ITC for CCUS, the ITC for clean technology, the ITC for clean electricity, or the ITC for clean hydrogen should property be eligible for more than one of these credits.
- CCUS tax credits related to eligible refurbishment costs (refurbishment ITCs):
- Total eligible refurbishment costs over the first 20 years of a project will be limited to a maximum of 10% of the total pre-operational costs that were eligible for the CCUS tax credit. Refurbishment ITCs will not be available after the end of the 20-year period.
- The refurbishment ITCs would be recovered if certain thresholds relating to eligible and ineligible uses are not met. Details will follow in a future EY Tax Alert.
- In addition to the annual Climate Risk Disclosure report, CCUS projects with $250 million or more in eligible expenses would be required to contribute to public knowledge sharing in Canada. Draft legislative proposals are included in the Notice of Ways and Means Motion.
Similar to certain other ITCs, the government intends to apply labour requirements to the CCUS ITC, with details to be announced at a later date.
The above measures related to the CCUS tax credit would apply to eligible expenses incurred after 2021 and before 2041.
Mineral exploration tax credit and flow-through shares
Budget 2023 proposes an expansion to the critical mineral exploration tax credit (CMETC) and flow-through share regime to include eligible expenses related to exploration and development activities for lithium from brines. Eligible expenses related to lithium from brines made after 28 March 2023 will qualify as Canadian exploration expenses and Canadian development expenses. The expanded CMETC applies to expenditures renounced under eligible flow-through share agreements entered into after 28 March 2023 and on or before 31 March 2027.
Dividend received deduction by financial institutions
Intercorporate dividends received from Canadian corporations are generally deductible for the recipient corporation. Budget 2023 proposes to deny the dividend received deduction in respect of dividends received by financial institutions on shares that are mark-to-market property (MTM property).
Shares are MTM property when a financial institution holds less than 10% of vote or value of the corporation issuing the shares. Under the mark-to-market rules, any change in fair value of an MTM property during the year is included in the financial institution’s taxable income for that year on account of income. Under the proposed measures, a financial institution, as defined under subsection 142.2(1) of the Income Tax Act, will be subject to tax on dividends received on shares from Canadian corporations that are MTM property.
This measure would apply to dividends received after 2023.
Income tax and GST/HST treatment of credit unions
Budget 2023 proposes to eliminate the revenue test from the definition of “credit union” included in the Income Tax Act and used in the Excise Tax Act, so that credit unions that earn more than 10% of their revenue from sources other than certain specified sources (such as interest income from lending activities) are no longer excluded from the definition. This proposed amendment to the definition of “credit union” for income tax and GST/HST purposes is introduced to accommodate how credit unions currently operate.
The amendment would apply in respect of taxation years of a credit union ending after 2016.
Alternative minimum tax (AMT)
Certain investment funds that do not qualify as mutual fund trusts under the Income Tax Act are subject to AMT. Budget 2023 proposes to increase the AMT rate (see Minimum tax for top earners below). AMT is generally unavoidable and can generally only be mitigated in situations where discretionary deductions are foregone. The investment funds industry has long sought measures to eliminate or reduce AMT for such funds.
International tax measures
International tax reform
Canada is one of 138 members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Group of 20 (G20) Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (the Inclusive Framework) that have joined a two-pillar plan for international tax reform agreed to on 8 October 2021.
Pillar One is intended to reallocate a portion of taxing rights over the profits of large/profitable multinational enterprises (MNEs) to market countries (i.e., where their users and customers are located). Pillar Two is intended to ensure that the profits of large MNEs with annual revenues of €750 million or more are subject to an effective tax rate of at least 15%, regardless of where they are earned.
In Budget 2023, the government provided an update on the most recent developments and upcoming implementation steps regarding the OECD recommendations on Pillar One and Pillar Two.
Pillar One – reallocation of taxing rights: Further to the OECD draft rules consolidated in two major progress reports released in July and October 2022, countries are working toward completing multilateral negotiations so that the convention to implement Pillar One can be signed by mid-2023, with a view to it entering into force in 2024.
Budget 2023 announced that the digital services tax (DST) could be imposed as of 1 January 2024, but only if the multilateral convention implementing the Pillar One framework has not come into force. In that event, the DST would be payable as of 2024 in respect of revenues earned as of 1 January 2022.
Pillar Two – global minimum tax: Consistent with the announcement in Budget 2022, Budget 2023 announces the government’s intention to introduce legislation implementing the income inclusion rule (IIR) and a domestic minimum top-up tax applicable to Canadian entities of MNEs that are within scope of Pillar Two, with effect for fiscal years of MNEs that begin on or after 31 December 2023.
The government also intends to implement the undertaxed profits rule (UTPR) with effect for fiscal years of MNEs that begin on or after 31 December 2024. The government intends to release draft legislative proposals for the IIR and domestic minimum top-up tax for public consultation in the coming months, with draft legislative proposals for the UTPR to follow at a later time. Budget 2023 also announces the government’s intention to share with provinces and territories a portion of the revenues from the international tax reform.
Previously announced international measures
Budget 2023 confirms the government’s intention to proceed with the following previously announced measures:
- Legislative proposals released on 3 November 2022 with respect to Excessive Interest and Financing Expenses Limitations (EIFEL)1
- Legislative proposals released on 9 August 2022, including with respect to the following measures:2
- Foreign affiliate share-for-share exchange exception
- Foreign merger anti-avoidance
- Foreign affiliate suppression election
- Upstream loans from foreign affiliates
- Base erosion rule for provision of services
- Other technical amendments to the Income Tax Act proposed in the 9 August release
- Legislative proposals released on 29 April 2022 with respect to hybrid mismatch arrangements3
- The transfer pricing consultation announced in Budget 20214
Anti-avoidance measures
Intergenerational share transfers
Section 84.1 of the Income Tax Act is an anti-surplus stripping rule designed to prevent the extraction of corporate surplus as a capital gain and would often apply to the intergenerational transfer of shares of a corporation. On 29 June 2021, private member’s Bill C-208, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (transfer of small business or family farm or fishing corporation), received Royal Assent. Bill C-208 contained amendments to section 84.1, including the introduction of an exception to the application of section 84.1 in respect of certain intergenerational transfers (the Inter-generational Transfer Exemption). Budget 2022 indicated that this exception may unintentionally permit surplus stripping without requiring a genuine intergenerational business transfer, and a consultation was launched on 7 April 2022 to solicit feedback from taxpayers as to how the existing rules could be modified to facilitate genuine intergenerational business transfers while maintaining the integrity of the tax system.
Consistent with the comments in Budget 2022, Budget 2023 proposes to introduce additional requirements to the Inter-generational Transfer Exemption to ensure it applies only where a genuine intergenerational business transfer takes place. The following existing conditions will be maintained:
- The transferor must be an individual (other than a trust).
- The transferred corporation shares must be qualified small business corporation shares or shares of the capital stock of a family farm or fishing corporation.
- The purchaser corporation must be controlled by one or more adult children of the transferor (which is defined to include grandchildren, stepchildren, children-in-law, nieces and nephews, and grandnieces and grandnephews).
In addition to the above, Budget 2023 proposes that, to obtain the Inter-generational Transfer Exemption, the transfer must be either an “Immediate Intergenerational Business Transfer” or a “Gradual Intergenerational Business Transfer.” The key conditions of each are as follows:
Immediate Intergenerational Business Transfer
- At all times after the sale, the parents cannot legally or factually control the transferred corporation.
- Parents immediately transfer a majority of the shares of the transferred corporation to the children, with the balance of the shares to be transferred within 36 months (in each case, non-voting preferred shares are exempt from this condition).
- The child(ren) retain(s) legal control of the transferred corporation, and at least one child remains actively involved in the transferred business, for a 36-month period following the share transfer.
- Parents transfer management of the business to their child(ren) within a reasonable time based on the particular circumstances (with a 36-month safe harbour).
Gradual Intergenerational Business Transfer
- At all times after the sale, the parents cannot legally control the transferred corporation.
- Parents immediately transfer a majority of the shares of the transferred corporation to the children, with the balance of the shares to be transferred within 36 months (in each case, non-voting preferred shares are exempt from this condition).
- Within 10 years of the initial sale, parents reduce the economic value of their debt and equity interests in the transferred corporation to: (a) 50% if it is a family farm or fishing corporation, or (b) 30% if it is a qualified small business corporation, as compared to the time of the sale.
- The child(ren) retain(s) legal control of the transferred corporation, and at least one child remains actively involved in the transferred business, for a 60-month period following the share transfer (or a longer period lasting until the reduction of economic value referred to above occurs).
- Parents transfer management of the business to their child(ren) within a reasonable time based on the particular circumstances (with a 60-month safe harbour).
Certain other conditions relating to the control or ownership of shares of the purchaser corporation or of other entities that carry on a business related to the transferred corporation’s business also exist.
Budget 2023 also proposes changes to the current provisions of the Inter-generational Transfer Exemption dealing with subsequent transfers of the transferred shares and to the lifetime capital gains exemption formula used for purposes of this provision.
The transferor and child (or children) will be required to jointly elect for the Inter-generational Transfer Exemption to apply. The child (or children) will be jointly and severally liable for any additional taxes payable by the transferor if the transfer does not qualify for the Inter‑generational Transfer Exemption.
The limitation period for reassessing the transferor’s liability for tax that may arise on the transfer is proposed to be extended by three years for an Immediate Intergenerational Business Transfer and by 10 years for a Gradual Intergenerational Business Transfer.
Budget 2023 also proposes to provide a 10-year capital gains reserve for transfers that qualify for the Inter-generational Transfer Exemption.
These measures would apply to transactions that occur on or after 1 January 2024.
General anti-avoidance rule (GAAR)
Following the consultation launched on 9 August 2022 on the modernization of the GAAR, Budget 2023 proposes to amend the GAAR by (1) introducing a preamble; (2) lowering the avoidance transaction standard; (3) introducing a “lack of economic substance” test; and (4) introducing a 25% penalty and extending the reassessment period by three years.
- The proposed preamble explains that the GAAR (a) applies to deny a tax benefit if a transaction misuses or abuses the Income Tax Act, but allows tax benefits contemplated by the Act, (b) balances a taxpayer’s need for certainty and the government’s need to protect the tax base and “the fairness of the tax system,” and (c) can apply regardless of whether a tax strategy is foreseen.
- The avoidance transaction threshold would be reduced. Currently, GAAR does not apply if a transaction was undertaken primarily for bona fide reasons other than to obtain a tax benefit. Now a transaction will be an avoidance transaction if “one of the main purposes” was to obtain a tax benefit.
- A transaction will tend to misuse or abuse if it “is significantly lacking in economic substance.” The legislation includes a list of non-exhaustive factors that “tend” to indicate a significant lack of economic substance, including no change in opportunity for gain, profit or risk of loss, the value of the tax benefit exceeding the non-tax economic return, and the transaction being substantially undertaken to obtain the tax benefit.
- GAAR transactions will now be subject to a 25% penalty and a three-year extension to the normal reassessment period, unless the transaction has been voluntarily or mandatorily disclosed to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).
The Crown will still bear the burden of establishing the underlying object, spirit and purpose of the provisions or scheme of the Act. The 9 August 2022 consultation paper had proposed shifting this burden to the taxpayer.
A consultation period will remain open for comments until 31 May 2023, following which the government intends to publish revised legislative proposals and announce the application date of the amendments.
Tax measures for individuals and trusts
Personal income tax rates
There are no personal income tax rate or tax bracket changes in this budget. The brackets will continue to be indexed for inflation.
See Table E for the 2023 federal personal income tax rates and brackets and the Appendix for the top combined marginal rates by province and territory.
Table E – Federal personal income tax rates