People against green and blue neon

How boards can embrace and oversee AI with curiosity and care


The 2024 EY Board Strategy Summit focused on how boards are governing for a tech-enabled future.


In brief

  • AI is a game changer, and effective boards must find use cases that generate revenue, increase efficiency, and minimize risk.
  • AI can pose significant risks, so boards and companies must educate themselves and agree on the appropriate AI strategies for their business.

Close to 100 Fortune 1000 board directors gathered at the 2024 EY Board Strategy Summit to hear from distinguished business and academic leaders about how boards are governing for a future that includes artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies. Topics explored effective oversight of AI and how boards can support innovation and strategy for the future.

Attendees were welcomed by EY Americas Strategic Relationships Leader, Ted Acosta’s AI generated avatar. Those in the room who knew Acosta personally picked up on a slightly robotic cadence of his AI twin, but this display of technology that is rapidly transforming every sector of the economy was more than a party trick. When the real Ted Acosta entered the stage, he quipped that his AI version, fluent in multiple languages, was more eloquent than he was. It could also be exploited as a deep fake. To demonstrate AI’s potential to do harm, Acosta’s avatar proceeded to solicit the audience for money in Japanese. This of course was done in jest to help illustrate the potential avatar uses.

This example of AI’s dual promise — its far-reaching benefits and possible perils — set the tone for the discussions about board oversight that followed.

In a world increasingly saturated with AI, the question of how boards can get the most out of it while using it responsibly was one of governance, said Janet Truncale, EY Global Chair and CEO. Technology is expanding beyond the CIO and CTO domain. Now AI is everywhere, and for CEOs, it has the potential to impact everything, at any time. AI must be part of a broader conversation that includes not just processes but also people, geopolitical concerns and long-term growth, all of which could reshape the structure and composition of boards.

Preparing leaders for an AI-accelerated future is about embracing emerging technology with purpose — as a director, it’s important to touch it, feel it and experiment with its applications in different domains. This is relatively easy to do with AI-driven collaboration and work tools. Sandi Peterson, Lead Independent Director at Microsoft, shared lessons she learned from working with the leadership team and the board. In these early days of AI adoption and development, she says it is important to have realistic conversations about the state of technology. This includes considering how long and how challenging it might be to fully realize the value of using these technologies.

For Peterson, the difference between good AI and bad AI is in its practical application. Like other major innovations that preceded it — the internet, mobile devices, cloud computing — AI is a game changer. But boards must find actual uses for the technology that are specific to the company and industry. It can generally improve performance and productivity in many general and administrative functions, but other use cases should be company-specific. Successful board leaders work with management to probe and create conviction around specific use cases, make a business case for it, then get to work.

Oscar-nominated actor Edward Norton, who has starred in some of Hollywood’s most popular films, took those lessons to heart when he cofounded Zeck — a cloud platform for streamlining board conferencing. In a recorded interview with Kris Pederson of the EY Center for Board Matters he recalled how frustrated he was by the drudgery and wheel-spinning that plagued board meetings. Norton would know: besides his cool day job as a famous actor, he is a serial entrepreneur who has served on dozens of boards. He noted that innovation can help boards work more efficiently, streamline board meeting prep and improve the presentation of materials to help directors focus on the forward-looking agenda.

Embedding intelligent data systems across an enterprise — and in the boardroom — could make this kind of problem solving easier. But while AI is the latest buzzword, those who’ve only heard about it recently have missed how this technology has evolved. During the “Embracing a tech-enabled boardroom panel,” Leroy Williams, CEO of CyberTekIQ, and Merline Saintil, Lead Independent Director of Rocket Lab, reminded the audience that AI is in fact a 50-year-old concept that is finally matched with our computational capacities to make it work. This unleashes a wide variety of risks and opportunities that directors — and their companies — will need to balance.

What’s new about it is its disruptive potential. That’s the cool thing about AI, said Rob Beard, Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Head of Global Policy at Mastercard — it can short-cut lots of different challenges. But boards also need to be mindful not to short-cut basic legal requirements. That means laying the legal groundwork for AI and AI-generated content: putting in place proper duty of care, meeting the minimum standards for legal readiness and preparing the right materials for the right stakeholders on time while upholding the client‑attorney privilege.

What Beard calls the “legal stuff” of AI, while necessary, is only part of the larger, more complicated ethical and governance landscape in which digital systems can advance into decision-making roles. The “Oversight of ethical AI” panel took the questions to the next level: Who are the guardians of AI? What are the costs of using AI to influence consumer behavior? What role should governments play? Jeff Saviano, EY Emerging Technology Strategy and Governance Leader, kicked off the discussion noting the historical precedent of US policymakers not weighing too heavily on emerging tech.

If technology is always ahead of regulations, what hope do governments have in coming up with comprehensive guidelines for something as fast moving as AI? That’s why, says Lex Suvanto, CEO of Edelman Smithfield, it is fundamental for boards to understand the ethical considerations of AI specifically for their company and then develop proper oversight guidelines. The cases of AI gone bad — many already documented, even litigated — pose real risks for companies and potentially directors themselves; however, these risks can be reduced if boards and companies educate themselves on the realities of AI, raise the floor on compliance, agree on leading practices and develop AI strategies tailored to their business.

 

A good sign that people start trusting new technology is when they stop talking about it, noted one of the session panelists. However, getting there may take time because our curiosity about AI is different from other complex systems — mostly because it’s new, but also because it’s on the trajectory toward autonomous decision-making.

 

That is precisely why boards should abandon old-fashioned planning and embrace “future mapping,” says Minsoo Pak, EY Americas Innovation Realized Leader. Pak, along with Mike Kanazawa, EY Global Innovation Realized Leader, tested this approach by conducting a live interactive exercise. Working together in breakout groups, board directors and business leaders mapped direct and indirect outcomes of future scenarios involving renewable energy, digital innovation, e-mobility, automation and other industry trends. The aim of the exercise, Pak explained, was not to solve immediate problems but to identify second, third and even fourth level implications of disruptive technologies — including those that don’t yet exist — and feed them back to present decision-making. This exercise is a great scenario-planning approach helping directors prompt new ways of identifying opportunities and also risks.

 

Longtime board leaders Mark Weinberger and Glenn Hubbard, who have successfully navigated through their own share of disruptions caused by booms and busts, energy crises, the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical rifts, talked about their experiences. In these cases — and now with the rapidly changing landscape of AI — disruption, when properly managed, can become a multiplier for commerce and product innovation. Boards that remain focused on good governance will help their companies succeed and bring a renewed sense of dynamism to global markets.

 

There is a growing consensus among board leaders: we are at the precipice of an AI-powered future. The technology is still in its most nascent form, bringing with it a complex set of challenges. But it is here, it isn’t going away and, chances are, your competitors are already using it to grow their business. For boards, walking the talk of AI means embracing it, with curiosity and care, changing governance approaches to leverage it, and always asking better questions.

Summary

The 2024 EY Board Strategy Summit featured several panel discussions and interactive sessions led by distinguished business and academic leaders. Attendees learned how leading boards are governing for tech-enabled future and how they can support innovation to enable growth. Conversations also explored the ethical use of AI and how boards can use “future-back thinking” techniques to effectively oversee strategy and innovation.

About this article

Contributors