Why should tax be part of a firm’s strategy discussion?
I like to describe tax as being at the end of the food chain. If something is broken, it will show up in the tax return. For example, if someone puts the wrong VAT code on a purchase order, it will go through the entire system wrong – from issuing of invoice to payment. At the end, the tax team will identify the mistake and the whole process will need redoing. Errors in upstream processes show up in tax anomalies. That’s why it’s important for tax to be an integral part of strategic projects.
Where should the board set the focus?
In this environment, the board’s basic needs are quite straightforward. Simplify, ensure objectivity, get the right level of comfort given the personal liability of board members, find sustainable solutions to be less people-reliant. In practice it means getting rid of side-reporting and Excel-based processes and focusing instead on objective KPIs and how you can manage them.
The next thing is cost. By digitalizing tax compliance, you get an immediate return on investment. You’re agile, you’re always in control of costs and benefits. My personal experience is that the return on investment is huge, especially in the area of input tax and avoiding penalties.
Finally, I think digital tax compliance is also relevant for strategic value. In the area of M&A, for example, you can do due diligence better, and you have opportunities in segmentation of transfer pricing – directly in the system. You can also fix any issues the first time, directly in the system; you don’t wait to fix them further down the line.