Wednesday 30 April
Judgment – C-278/24 Genzyński
Topics – Joint and severally liability for members of a board
A Polish referral asking whether Articles 193, 205 and 273 of the VAT Directive, in conjunction with Article 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, together with the principle of proportionality, should be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides for a mechanism whereby a member of the board of directors of a legal person is jointly and severally liable for the VAT debts of that legal person without it having first been established whether that member of the board of directors acted in bad faith or whether his or her conduct could be found to constitute a culpable error or negligence?
Thursday 8 May
Judgment – C-615/23 Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Services de transport public)
Topics – Compensation and taxable amount
A Polish referral asking whether compensation paid by a local authority to a transport operator should be included in the taxable amount under Article 73 of the VAT Directive. The operator, independent from the local authority, sought clarification on the VAT implications of potential arrangements where it would act as the operator for public transport services. The operator would earn revenue from ticket sales, compensation for lost revenue due to concessionary fares, and other sources, but would also receive compensation from the local authority to cover losses incurred.
Opinion – C-744/23 Zlakov
Topics – Free legal services – supply for VAT purposes
A Bulgarian referral asking whether a ‘supply of services’ within the meaning of Articles 2(1)(c), 24(1), 26(1)(b) and 28 of the VAT Directive is to be interpreted as including; (i) the provision of legal aid free of charge (pro bono) by a lawyer to a party in court proceedings or (ii) by the lawyer of a party which has been successful in a legal dispute, where the court awards that party’s lawyer the remuneration which he or she would have received if remuneration had been agreed under a contract for legal assistance? Is ‘taxable person’ within the meaning of Article 28 and Article 75 to be interpreted as covering a lawyer (a one-person law firm) who has provided legal services in either of these circumstances?
Judgment – C-405/24 L.s.c.
Topics – Exemption from taxes of imports of small consignments of goods of a non-commercial character
A Polish referral asking whether the provisions of Article 143(b) of the VAT Directive, and Article 1 of Directive 2006/79 on the exemption from taxes of imports of small consignments of goods of a non-commercial character from third countries, is to be interpreted as being contrary to national legislation according to which the importation of goods placed under ‘consignment’ sent from the territory of a third country by an individual and intended for an individual residing in the territory of a Member State of the European Union other than the territory of the country where the importation takes place is not exempt from VAT?