Last year was a good example of such discrepancies, also depending on the rating, where substantial differences were observed, e.g., the market rate for BB, 5-year, EUR denominated loans was around 6% in the second part of the year, i.e., significantly higher than the safe-harbor maximum borrowing rate applicable for the same year (2.75% until 1 million and 1.25% above).
These differences could lead to conflicts in an international context when other countries only accept interest rates calculated based on the market approach. Concretely, this would mean that if a Swiss company with a BB rating borrowed from a foreign related entity in Q3 of 2022, the foreign tax authorities might have required an interest rate which would have been much higher than the maximum borrowing rate allowed by the SFTA.
The significant increase of the published safe-harbor rates for 2023 will remedy these differences, at least partially, but the current market volatility is highlighting the limits of the application of safe-harbor rates for intercompany loans implemented by Swiss entities in an international environment.
Conclusion and recommendations
Nowadays, differences between market and safe-harbor rates are often increasing due to higher volatility and changes in the markets, and this puts more pressure on multinational companies which are relying on the safe-harbor rates to defend their position in Switzerland.
The Circular Letters specify that interest rates deviating from the safe-harbor guidance are acceptable if it can be shown that the applied rates adhere to the arm’s length principle. In practice, such deviations are generally accepted by the Swiss tax authorities when taxpayers provide supporting evidence of such deviation. Appropriate transfer pricing analyses and corresponding documentation should be available to deliver this proof.
In addition, depending on the materiality of the transaction, it is recommended to enter into a ruling with the Swiss tax authorities (SFTA and/or at cantonal level) in order to confirm upfront the arm’s length nature of interest rates in cases of deviations from those published in the circulars.