EY - City view sunset

US Immigration: Preparing for the US Department of State domestic visa pilot program

Related topics

Authored by Dushinka Khemraj and Sarah Sanger 


In brief

  • Is your organization ready for the launch of the newly proposed pilot program?
  • Have you aligned your mobility programs to reap the benefits of the proposed pilot program?

The United States Department of State (DOS) plans to launch later in 2023 a pilot program that will allow for the renewal of non-immigrant visas domestically from within the United States.1

The return of stateside visa renewals is highly anticipated due to the significant backlogs US consulates abroad have been experiencing post-pandemic. The program will help reduce the workload of US consular offices abroad, as visa holders will finally have the option to renew their visas while in the US. This anticipated change would permit applicants to attend to this need through DOS offices located in the United States rather than being required to travel to attend a consulate abroad.

The DOS plans to initially restrict the pilot to H and L visas only, and will start with a small number of cases with the hope that it will expand with time.2

In this article, we endeavor to provide a brief history of the original domestic visa reissuance program, delve into the changes in volumes and complexities of processing visas since the program was cancelled and provide recommendations for the DOS on how to narrow the scope of the pilot program to help it succeed.

History of visa reissuance

In 1987, the DOS was authorized to reissue visas to certain categories domestically within the United States.3 The original intent of this law was to provide nonimmigrant services to foreign government officials and international organization employees.4 The authority was subsequently extended to reissuances of E, H, I, L, O and P visa classifications.5
 

Arising from this authority, nonimmigrants were allowed to “renew their visas by mail with the State Department US Visa Office in Washington DC rather than through a US consulate abroad.”6

To qualify for the domestic visa revalidation program, applicants had to “be in valid E, H, I, L, O or P nonimmigrant status and they must have been previously issued a visa at a US consulate abroad and admitted to the United States in the same status they are maintaining.”7 Visas could be revalidated in the United States in the period beginning 60 days before to one year after expiration.8  This program was a popular option for foreign nationals whose consulates had a high volume of applications and processing backlogs.9 
 

After the events of 9/11, the US Government introduced heightened security requirements including S. 303 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act. One of the provisions of this new law necessitated increased interview requirements, and specifically that visas issued after October 26, 2004 must include biometric identifiers.10

On July 16, 2004, the DOS ceased to accept new applications for visa reissuance.11 In taking this step, the DOS deemed it not feasible to collect the biometric identifiers in the US and that US consulates abroad were better equipped to collect such information.12

Consequently, all visa reissuances after July 2004 have been required to be processed at visa adjudicating posts located abroad.13 Stateside visa revalidation remains an option for certain diplomatic and international organization visas after 2004.14 The program has never been revived, despite improvements in technology to collect biometric information. Numerous groups have called for the program to be revived due to the significant backlogs and strain on consulates abroad. These groups have stated that domestic visa renewals will eliminate the requirement to travel abroad, where individuals “may need to remain for uncertain periods of time before they can obtain interview appointments at the embassy or consulate.”15

Changes in volume of visa issuances

The cancellation of the domestic visa reissuance program for E, H, I, L, O and P visa classifications significantly impacted the number of nonimmigrant visas issued by the DOS. In 2004, the DOS issued 77,299 nonimmigrant visas. In the following year, however, the number of visas issued dropped sharply to only 16,538.16 It can therefore be fairly inferred that domestic visa reissuances comprised a large portion of the nonimmigrant visas issued by the DOS prior to the program being cancelled.

EY immigration chart 3
EY immigration chart 2

In the years following the cancellation of the domestic visa reissuance program, the number of visas issued did not bounce back to the pre-2004 levels.17 The volume of visas issued stabilized at around 12,000 to 13,000 per year, with a minor dip to approximately 9,000 during the pandemic.18 Therefore, the Visa Office has not seen the heavy volume of non-immigrant visa issuances since the visa revalidation program was cancelled in 2004. The Visa Office is likely not prepared to now process such a high volume of applications as it has not done so in many years.

Impact of the pandemic

The pandemic substantially changed the state of immigration, and we continue to witness the lasting impact today. In 2020, the DOS suspended most routine visa services during the pandemic, which disrupted the lives of countless of people.19

Even by October 2021, a staggering 60% of consulates remained fully closed or available only for emergency nonimmigrant visa appointments.20 The closures of consulates abroad led to inordinate wait times — months to even years of delay. Many individuals had to forgo travel and missed important events during the pandemic as they were not confident of being able to make a timely return to the United States.21 Further, many individuals who did travel outside of the US found themselves stranded when there were sudden closures of the US consulates due to resurgences in COVID-19 cases.22

The pandemic also had a significant impact on the volume of non-immigrant visas issued at consulates abroad. The volume of H visas issued between the years 2016 and 2019 ranged on an annual basis of between approximately 532,000 and 619,000.23 The volume of L visas issued between 2016 and 2019 ranged, similarly on an annual basis, from 153,000 to 165,000.24

EY immigration chart 1

Moving forward to 2022, the number of H and L visas issued spiked significantly due to the pandemic backlogs. In 2022, the number of H visas issued jumped to 769,299, while the number of L visas issued was 151,406.25 Whereas in 2020, there were 468,123 H visas issued and 71,652 L visas issued.26 This represents a staggering 61% increase in H and 47% increase in L visas issued from 2020 to 2022.

While consulates have reopened and are attempting to resume pre-pandemic service, they have not been able to keep up with the demand and backlog of visa appointments. We do not anticipate a slowdown in the number of visa issuances for 2023 as the consulates try to make up for the pandemic closures.

It is also interesting to note the impact of these volumes in specific locations. Although so-called visa interview wait times have improved in other countries, India continues to experience longer appointment delays. India has the some of the greatest such delays, with applicants in Hyderabad waiting an average of 136 days and Chennai a staggering 157 day simply to obtain an appointment to be assessed for an H or L visa.27

The President’s Advisory Commission on Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders made several recommendations for how to handle the backlog at US consulates in India, including recommending the revival of the stateside visa revalidation program.28 This may have been the inspiration for the new anticipated visa revalidation pilot program. “The current procedure for restamping H-1B and L-1 visas is to go to a US consulate outside the United States and submit H-1B or L-1 visas, passports and other documents by way of a dropbox or interview.”29 However, with the continued backlogs in visa interview wait times, this procedure is proving to be unduly onerous for visa holders from India.

These significant processing delays are of notable impact because a large number of H and L visas issued are to Indian foreign nationals. In 2022, 282,927 H visas were issued in India, which accounted for 91% of all H visas issued for the region of Asia.30 Similarly, 43,542 L visas were issued in India in 2022, which represents 62% of all L visas issued for the region of Asia.31 Overall, 43% of all nonimmigrant visas issued in 2022 for Indian foreign nationals were for H and L visas.32 Moreover, it is clear that Indian foreign nationals represent a large portion of the overall increase in all H and L visa issuance numbers in 2022.

Recommendations

The number of visa issuances in 2022 is significantly higher than the numbers previously processed at consulates abroad before the pandemic. However, the number of visas issued domestically by the Visa Office has dropped significantly since the visa revalidation program was cancelled in 2004. As a result of the backlog of cases after the pandemic, the DOS will likely face far greater volumes and challenges with the proposed pilot program than was the case when the program was originally offered. As such, and in anticipation that the volume of interested applicants will be very high due to the continued backlogs at consulates abroad, there are numerous considerations that should be made for the pilot program to succeed.

As an overriding factor, it will be important to consider how to narrow the scope of the program to make it manageable to process visa revalidations in a timely manner. Presently, very little is known about the details of the pilot program. At the recent AILA Spring Conference in Washington, DC, the DOS stated that that the pilot program is expected to start in October 2023 and to focus on H and L visas as the main visa categories.33 Additionally, the DOS stated that it will be creating the largest consular section in the world within the United States solely to support this program.34 With the promise of this commitment in mind, several essential recommendations come to mind.

  1. Rolling out the program in October will be advantageous to visa applicants, as domestic extension processing would then be available to applicants prior to the holidays in December. This step should allow foreign nationals to visit their families without fear of being stranded due to visa wait times.
  2. As the program will likely involve the mailing in of a passport in support of the application to get the visa stamp, it is important that the DOS attempt to process the applications as swiftly as possible to avoid holding visas for too long. Unreasonable holding periods of these passports would prevent applicants from even having the option of traveling. Assuming it takes eight weeks to process the applications and return visas to applicants, the October 2023 start date should provide ample time to process visas before the holidays in December.

    It is also important to recall that the main reason the program was cancelled in the past was due to the difficulty of domestically collecting biometric identifiers. The DOS recently stated, “The possibility of relying on previously collected fingerprints would overcome one obstacle to resuming domestic renewal.”35 With advances in technology, the collection and storage of biometric identifiers digitally would help overcome the obstacle the DOS faced in 2004 that led to the program’s cancellation.
  3. It would make sense to rely on the biometrics collected for the applicants’ initial application to expedite the process and avoid the need for an additional biometrics appointment.
  4. To expedite the processing of applications, the DOS could consider having an online portal where potential applicants can start an application by filling out a process-focused questionnaire. This proposed document would concentrate on screening and security questions designed to weed out applicants who do not fit the narrow scope of the initial pilot offering. Such an online application portal would help reduce the volume of submissions if such applicants must pass a pre-screening before tendering their application and waste time in mailing in their passport. This recommendation could help streamline the process and reduce the volume of applications the DOS is obliged to process initially.
  5. Once the applicant limit has been reached, the portal could be designed to close and not accept new applications until the pending applications have been processed. Closing the portal once the applicant limit has been reached would allow the DOS to have time to evaluate the program to identify strengths and inefficiencies for future processing. It would also be a valuable data point in determining whether it is feasible to expand the program further.
  6. An important consideration that could expedite processing times for the pilot program is security screening. The DOS should consider implementing a security questionnaire like the DS-160 to further narrow the pool of applicants to only those with no criminal history and who have never been subject to an arrest or waiver. This would help ensure applications are processed expeditiously.

    The questionnaire could ensure, for example, that the pool of applicants should be limited to those who hold valid H or L nonimmigrant status, have been previously issued a visa at a US consulate abroad and admitted to the United States in the same status they are maintaining, and have a visa that has been expired for 12 months or more. Important security questions could be leveraged from the DS-160 in this questionnaire to ensure applicants have not been subject to removability or inadmissibility in the last five years, been arrested or convicted of a crime, been convicted of an aggravated felony, violated any law related to controlled substances, involved in money laundering/human trafficking/terrorist activities, or any other illegal activity.
  7. The program could be restricted to blanket L visa applicants and focus only on the main applicant. Family members, such as L-2 or H4 applicants, should, in our view, only be included in the undertaking when the program gains traction and has proven to be successful. The program should be limited to a specific number — such as the first 10,000 applicants who apply and meet the requirements to ensure that the Visa Office is able to manage and efficiently process all the applications it accepts as part of the pilot program.
  8. Beyond the pure mechanics of the program management itself, one further step that could help the program succeed would be to determine where the greatest need lies. This would be best done by looking at what countries have the biggest backlog for interviews and/or have the greatest number of visa issuances.

Due to the large volume of applicants from India and the extensive visa appointment wait times in that country, it would appear to make sense for the DOS to narrow the scope of the program to heavily focus on H and L visa applicants from India. Given the knowledge we have about the hardships that Indian foreign nationals have suffered due to the long wait times and their inability to renew their visas domestically, prioritizing applications from Indian foreign nationals would help alleviate the backlog. In particular, the DOS could choose to prioritize applicants from India who are from the regions of Chennai and Hyderabad, as these issuing offices have the longest wait times in India.

Conclusion

Overall, we believe the revival of the domestic visa revalidation program marks a change in the right direction. In particular, the program as described would help alleviate the backlogs and uncertainty that have arisen since the pandemic. Indian foreign nationals have, in particular, been negatively impacted by the pandemic and their inability to renew their visas in the US. This deliberate program choice has caused many Indian nationals to wait years to see their families, to miss out on important life events and to put their employment at risk if they attempted to depart the country.

We hope the DOS strongly considers prioritizing Indian foreign nationals when determining how to narrow the scope of the program since they account for a large proportion of all H and L visas issued.

We’re optimistic about the possibilities of this pilot program, and hope it is successful and can be expanded and enhanced in the years to come.


Summary

Key takeaways for mobility professionals

What mobility professionals can do to prepare:

  • Connect with your immigration counsel to learn more about the scope and timing of this program, especially since the DOS is anticipated to announce further details as the new fiscal year approaches in October 2023.
  • Educate your businesses about the proposed change and how it could impact current reimbursement policies or travel guidelines.
  • Identify and connect with employees in your organization who might benefit most from having their visa renewed domestically, with an eye particularly on Indian nationals and others from areas that have higher backlogs in US consulates in their home country.

About this article

Related Articles

Pair sound strategy with supportive ecosystem to effectively reskill

Learn why investing in a learning and development ecosystem is critical to the success of reskilling and upskilling.

Deploy tech wisely to close critical talent gaps

Learn how a continuous, tech-backed framework for upskilling and reskilling can help organizations unleash greater ROI from learning programs and close skill gaps.

How can reimagined mobility help organizations see reward and not risk?

Unlock insights from the EY 2023 Mobility Reimagined Survey showing workforce mobility’s reality doesn’t always live up to potential. Read more.