Why some Global Capability Centers (GCCs) fail

Why some Global Capability Centers (GCCs) cannot deliver value

We delve into a few common themes observed over the years and understand why some GCCs fail.

In the last decade, India has seen many GCCs being setup across the country. They cover several industries, employ between a few hundred to a few thousands of people, and span across multiple functions and have a varied technology landscape. Most of them are highly successful and become case studies for other organizations, but a few do not turn out as envisioned, and it’s interesting to study the reasons that is the case. A few common themes stand out.

Lack of executive sponsorship - An organizational need usually drives a GCC setup and the most common ones are around cost or process efficiency, enablement of a large transformation or augmenting current teams with skills. However, once the idea gets executed, it requires sponsorship from the highest levels of management. That’s because establishing a GCC requires an understanding of the costs involved; the time taken to get a return on investment and establishment of the GCC operating model that allows the center to flourish and grow.

Related case study

Case study: How a US-based company established a finance GCC in India during COVID-19

A leading US-based home improvement company collaborated with EY in setting up their finance GCC in India during COVID-19. Learn more about finance digital transformation case study.

    The correct GCC operating model - By operating model, we mean the organization structure, activity placement and handoff, the ability to deliver end-to-end processes and the sourcing strategy. If an organization is complex and the processes are highly fragmented, spanning across multiple teams, or there is a lack of understanding on ownership of platforms, processes or transformations, then establishing a GCC will only amplify this issue. In such a case where large organization realignment is not possible, a prudent approach would be to carve out a subset of processes handed over to the GCC to manage end-to-end activities, and then set goals for the center to enhance and make the processes efficient.
     

    Empowering GCCs to make strategic decisions - The question, “what should the GCC do?” usually precedes the decision to empower GCCs. Should it simply follow instructions and perform repetitive tasks, or can it add value by driving the organization’s transformation agenda? Should the answer be the latter, then empower the GCC leadership. In the truest case of empowerment, a GCC leader should be able to drive a budget and perform resource allocation, meeting the organization’s needs, rather than being tied up in a bureaucratic approval process for every requirement.
     

    Understanding local nuances before planning - It’s always best to partner with someone locally, especially if the organization has limited understanding of the local market and the on-ground challenges. Often companies make the mistake of creating ambitious growth plans that are separated from reality.
     

    Every company today is trying to hire top talent and the supply of certain skills is severely limited; and the situation is the same regardless of where you are in the world, and even more so in India where thousands of GCCs are operating alongside very large service providers in accessing a common talent pool.

    The idea is to shape the GCC growth story in phases – the first phase usually takes the longest and is very important to the creation of the GCC organization structure and critical mass.

    The subsequent phases are much shorter, with the local leadership driving towards the goals and objectives. Similarly, understanding cultural sensitivities is equally important. What works in other countries may not work in India and tweaking expectations may prove beneficial in the long run.
     

    Right measures at the right time - When a GCC starts out, the measurement of how well it is performing might involve very rudimentary elements such as the rate of ramp up, onboarding time and setup costs. However, these might no longer be relevant in subsequent years. The metrics tracked should change over time and become increasingly challenging to push the boundaries–only then will a GCC jump levels of maturity and deliver beyond expectations.
     

    These are only a select subset of challenges which GCCs face in the initial years of their existence. They define the success or failure of the centers. There are many more such as the quality of local leadership, the organization culture and internal dynamics and the sourcing strategy, which need discussions when beginning the GCC journey.

    Summary

    While most of the GCCs are highly successful and become case studies for other organizations, a few do not turn out as envisioned. What are the factors that determine the success of a GCC? The key to establishing a successful GCC is to fix some of these issues upfront, which can significantly enhance the image of a GCC - from being just a resource center to a true capability center.

    About this article

    Authors