5 minute read 23 Jun 2023
office meeting

If public projects are in the spotlight, how to make them shine?

By Axel Timm

Partner, Government & Public Sector | EY Switzerland

Axel is transforming organizations in different Industries, implementing ERP Applications around the globe. As trusted Advisor and Business Unit Leader he advises on Technology and Digitalization.

5 minute read 23 Jun 2023

We share highlights from EY’s GPS whitepaper on public sector projects – focusing on features, challenges and success factors.

In brief
  • What are the key challenges facing public sector projects?
  • How does the public sector define project success?
  • Where should project managers focus to ensure positive outcomes?

Megatrends – such as demographic and social developments, rapid urbanization, shifting global economic powers, climate change and technological breakthroughs – make change essential. The public administration sector is not exempt from these forces and must invest continuously in projects and initiatives to stay up to date and relevant for all stakeholders.

To succeed, public sector projects must make the right use of resources, apply sound and realistic planning, and ensure good management. Large-scale transformation projects are usually time-consuming and costly.  Made cautious by past experience, the public now exerts permanent pressure for resources to be used efficiently – and demonstrably so. Against this background, it’s important to understand the features of public sector projects, the challenges they face and the definitions of successful outcomes. This article focuses on these aspects based on a recent whitepaper released by EY.

Download the whitepaper to read our information in full:

office meeting

GPS whitepaper – Public sector projects

Take a more detailed look how to address challenges in public sector projects and how to succeed in them.

Download the PDF

Features and challenges of public sector projects

Public sector projects are the responsibility of state or state-affiliated institutions and are largely financed with public funds. They serve the interests of the general public and contribute to improving public infrastructure and public services. The public sector is under pressure to provide modern, innovative and efficient products as well as solutions for its services. In addition, it must also respond to and incorporate political discourse in its decision-making. 

Public sector projects encompass a variety of features which are different to those of the private sector. The following principles are typical:

  1. The focus is less on financial goals than in the private sector
  2. The project is designed to have a long life
  3. There are links and cooperation with different stakeholder groups
  4. The projects are often large-scale
  5.  They depend on the political discourse and the political environment
  6. There is a defined project management process

Another commonly observed feature of public sector projects is that they are under intense pressure to be executed efficiently, deliver visible and sustainable results and benefit the public. It is not uncommon for the media to pick up on projects that fall behind schedule or fail to produce the desired outcome. Frequent points of criticism include non-adherence to schedules and budgets as well as the waste of taxpayers’ money. Well-known examples from the German-speaking “DACH” region include the construction of the Elbe Philharmonic Hall in Hamburg and Berlin Brandenburg Airport. In both cases, a combined lack of risk management, optimism bias and incomplete planning led not only to a drastic extension of the project duration, but also budget overruns that required political justification. But Switzerland also has examples of suboptimal project planning that have been covered in the media. For years, the Swiss federal railway company, SBB, has had to justify issues related to the purchase of Bombardier trains and address the consequences of this decision.

Digitalization projects also regularly come under scrutiny even if the project is at an advanced stage of completion. An example here is the BLS project to replace the “RailOpt” software, which was launched in 2016. Three years into the project, the planned software changes were found to be too costly. In 2019, the project had to be written off with an impairment loss of more than 20 million Swiss francs. The federal government also faces challenges in the area of digitalization and transformation. These topics often attract media attention, which in turn influences the social consensus regarding efficiency and use of taxpayers’ money in the public sector. Many high-profile public sector projects have failed not only because of challenges already familiar from the private sector, but because they have come under additional public pressure.

Defining project success

While project failures are usually easy to identify, definitions of success span a variety of factors. Most definitions cover the components of time, cost and performance. Other metrics have been added across multiple business areas. The International Project Management Association (IPMA) defines project success as “the ability to deliver the project’s product in scope, time, cost and quality”. The PMBOK Guide addresses the importance of objectives, time, cost and performance to the success of a project.

Additionally, the Project Management Institute (PMI) defines project success as a complex construct made up of a number of factors. PMI goes beyond simple definitions and emphasizes that other factors must be considered for project success:

  • Client satisfaction

    An important indicator of project success is the client’s satisfaction with the outcome of the project. A satisfied client is more likely to award further projects or contracts. This can lead to long-term business relationships.

  • Achievement of strategic goals

    A successful project must also support the achievement of strategic goals. If a project can significantly support the achievement of one or more strategic goals, the project manager will receive substantially more tailwind for implementing the project.

  • Compliance with quality standards

    Project success also depends on the project’s ability to produce high-quality results that meet clients’ requirements.

  • Project team effectiveness

    A project team that is able to perform the required tasks and solve problems is an important factor in successfully executing and completing the project.

  • Social impact

    A successful project has a positive, long-term benefit and a lasting impact on society and the environment.

  • Reputation of the organizational unit (OU)

    A successful project helps to strengthen the brand of the organizational unit. If a project can be brought to a positive conclusion, this can help the organizational unit to be perceived as customer-oriented, innovative and professional.

  • Sustainable impact of outcomes

    A positively concluded project produces sustainable project results. This ensures that the outcomes meet the needs of stakeholders in the long term and have a positive impact on the organization as well as the environment.

Lead your project to success

We have identified six ways to help you make your project a success:

  1. Engage in transparent and regular communication
  2. Tackle fewer projects but focus on the right ones
  3. Take a holistic view
  4. Apply appropriate project management methods
  5. Set clear project objectives
  6. Involve the client closely

It is important to note that each project is unique and it may be necessary to add additional steps or adjust your focus to achieve the best possible outcome. Download the whitepaper to read EY’s detailed recommendations for successful outcomes and learn how agile approaches can support the project process.

Summary

The pressures and challenges associated with public sector projects differ in various ways compared to the private sector. Understanding the unique features is the first step securing successful outcomes that benefit all stakeholders.

Acknowledgements

We thank David Zeller, Johannes Scholz and Natasa Stevanovic for their valuable contribution to this article.

  • Reference

    This article is informed by the following sources:

    1. Patanakul Peerasit, Young Hoon Kwak, Ofer Zwikael, and Min Liu. “What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects?” International journal of project management 34, no. 3 (2016): 452-466., p. 7.
    2. Van der Waldt, Gerrit. “The uniqueness of public sector project management: A contextual perspective.” Politeia 30, no. 2 (2011): 66-87.
    3. Fiedler, Jobst, and Sascha Schuster. “The Elbphilharmonie Hamburg”. Large Infrastructure Projects in Germany: Between Ambition and Realities (2016): 39-85.
    4. https://www.bls.ch/de/unternehmen/medien/medienmitteilungen/2019/09-24-mm-rps-projektabbruch [09.03.2023] [in German]
    5.  vzpm: www.vzpm.ch/de [09.03.2023] [in German]
    6. Shenhar, Aaron, and Vered Holzmann. “The three secrets of megaproject success: Clear strategic vision, total alignment, and adapting to complexity.” Project Management Journal 48, no. 6 (2017): 29-46., p.32.

About this article

By Axel Timm

Partner, Government & Public Sector | EY Switzerland

Axel is transforming organizations in different Industries, implementing ERP Applications around the globe. As trusted Advisor and Business Unit Leader he advises on Technology and Digitalization.