In The Office: Male Monitoring Specialist Holding Laptop Computer And Standing Next To Big Digital Screen With Graphs And Charts. Caucasian Man Analyzing Data, Performance Records, And Filing Report.

How can neobanks balance Innovation and compliance amidst AML challenges?

Proactive compliance is not just a necessity; it is a strategic advantage that will help neobanks thrive in the long run.


In brief

  • Do you see proactive compliance as a tick-the-box activity or strategic advantage to thrive in the long run?
  • Do you wonder whether – or proactively ensure that – your organization is fully compliant with regulatory expectations?
  • Are your AML/CTF/sanctions frameworks and processes ready for a regulatory scrutiny in an increasingly complex financial landscape?

Switzerland, the biggest financial hub of cross-border wealth management business and financial stability, has observed with keen interest the rise of neobanks in Europe and the UK. As these digital-first banks promise to transform the banking landscape, they also bring new risks—chief among them is the challenge of anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. While the Swiss banking industry has been synonymous with robust regulatory frameworks, recent regulatory penalties against neobanks in other jurisdictions serve as a reminder that innovation should go hand-in-hand with compliance. 

The success of neobanks lies in the agility to adopt new technologies, simplifying processes like account opening and transaction management. However, as these digital banks grow, they face a critical challenge: ensuring robust AML compliance and adhering to regulatory requirements. The recent penalties imposed on neobanks in the UK and Europe illustrate the risks of prioritizing rapid expansion over comprehensive compliance frameworks.

As digital banks continue to emerge, it’s essential for them to develop effective AML systems early in their journey. While the industry is enthusiastic about the potential for innovation, the lessons from regulatory actions in neighboring markets provide a roadmap for what needs to be done to avoid similar pitfalls.

Learning from regulatory actions in the UK

Several neobanks in the UK have incurred hefty penalties for lapses in AML controls. Initially praised for their innovation and rapid growth, these institutions’ ability to manage the complexities of compliance didn’t keep pace as their customer bases expanded.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA, UK) noted under the summary of reasons for action against one of the neobanks that the bank “underwent exponential growth” over a period of time and “its financial crime controls, however, failed to keep pace with its growth”.

As neobanks scale, their compliance frameworks can become stretched, leaving gaps in areas like customer due diligence, sanctions screening and transaction monitoring. What starts as an agile and lean operation can quickly become a high-risk environment for financial crime if the appropriate controls aren’t put in place early.

The fate of neobanks in the UK serves as a cautionary tale. While these banks were successful in attracting new customers, they faced significant setbacks due to regulatory sanctions. The cost wasn’t just financial; it also damaged their reputations and undermined trust with customers and investors. For any digital-first institution, this loss of trust can be difficult to rebuild, making the case for strong compliance frameworks from the outset.

Innovation and compliance: building the right foundation

It’s clear that innovation in the financial sector must go hand-in-hand with compliance. Financial regulators across Europe and beyond are increasing their scrutiny of digital banks, focusing on areas like AML, know your customer (KYC) and sanctions controls. For neobanks, the key is to ensure that compliance is embedded into the fabric of their operations from the beginning, rather than being seen as a regulatory box to tick later.

The challenge, of course, is that many neobanks are designed to operate lean, technology-driven models. While this offers efficiencies, it can sometimes result in a lack of investment in the compliance infrastructure needed to support rapid growth. Neobanks can capitalize on their tech leadership by embracing tools such as AI-driven transaction monitoring and automated sanctions screening. These systems must be capable of scaling as the bank grows, ensuring that compliance doesn’t fall behind customer acquisition.

 

Responsibility across regulations

A robust AML and sanctions framework is the cornerstone of any responsible financial institution, particularly for neobanks that operate in a fast-paced, high-growth environment. Neobanks often serve a younger, more tech-savvy audience that expects ease of use and efficiency. But with this ease of access comes increased risks of financial crime. Ensuring that there are strong processes for identifying, monitoring and reporting suspicious activities isn’t just about meeting regulatory requirements—it’s about safeguarding the integrity of the entire banking system.

An effective AML framework must include real-time transaction monitoring, dynamic sanctions screening, and comprehensive customer due diligence that continues throughout the customer relationship. A common issue seen in recent regulatory actions was the failure of neobanks to adequately screen customers or update their AML processes as their customer bases grew. Without this dynamic approach, financial institutions risk becoming attractive targets for illicit activities.

One of the primary reasons for regulatory penalties has been inadequate sanctions screening, where institutions failed to update their lists in line with geopolitical changes or ignored high-risk customers. A sanctions framework needs to be adaptive and continually updated, particularly in light of changing global political conditions.

 

A proactive approach to AML

Taking a proactive approach to AML compliance is not just about avoiding regulatory penalties; it’s also about fostering long-term trust and stability. A neobank that invests in comprehensive compliance systems demonstrates its commitment to security and financial integrity, which can become a key differentiator in a crowded market.

A key lesson from recent penalties in Europe is that compliance frameworks must be dynamic. For example, sanctions lists are constantly evolving, particularly in the context of global political events. Neobanks must ensure their systems are not only robust but also regularly updated to reflect the latest regulations and risks. An ongoing commitment to customer due diligence and transaction monitoring is essential, as regulatory bodies have shown a willingness to penalize those that fail to meet these standards.

 

Practical steps for neobanks to strengthen compliance

To avoid the pitfalls seen in other markets, neobanks should consider the following steps:

Compliance as a competitive advantage

For neobanks, focusing on AML compliance from the start can be more than just risk mitigation—it can also be a competitive advantage. Customers are becoming more aware of the importance of security, especially in a digital-first world. A strong reputation for compliance can help digital banks differentiate themselves, particularly in markets that are highly regulated or where customer trust is paramount.

By leveraging the latest technologies, neobanks can make compliance more efficient, reducing the friction that sometimes comes with stringent regulatory requirements. AI-powered solutions can help detect suspicious activity in real-time, improving the ability to respond to potential threats swiftly. Automated systems also help reduce the burden on compliance teams, freeing up resources to focus on other critical areas of the business.


Summary

The digital banking landscape offers immense opportunities for innovation and customer growth, but it also brings increased scrutiny from regulators. Neobanks that embrace compliance early and view it as part of their core infrastructure, rather than a regulatory afterthought, are more likely to succeed in the long term. A robust AML and sanctions framework is the cornerstone of sustainable growth in the neobanking space.


About this article


Related articles

Do you see name screening as a journey or a destination?

Four questions to guide financial institutions on ongoing KYC that effectively – and continuously – mitigates the risk of financial crime.

Is FinCrime management bolted onto or built into your workflow system?

An integrated IT system with analytics capabilities enables suspicious activity to be flagged and managed as it occurs.