In Refinitiv Ltd & Ors, the Court of Appeal has unanimously upheld the decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) to dismiss a judicial review claim against diverted profits tax (DPT) notices. The UK claimant companies (‘Refinitiv’) argued that DPT notices issued to them were unlawful because they conflicted with an earlier advance pricing agreement (APA) between them and HMRC.
Refinitiv provided services to a Swiss group entity which enhanced the value of intellectual property (IP) that the Swiss entity owned. In 2013, Refinitiv entered into a five-year APA with HMRC covering 2010-2014 (with a roll-back to 2008). This used a ‘cost-plus’ transfer pricing method to calculate arm's length compensation for services provided by the claimants to the Swiss entity. In 2018, the Swiss entity disposed of the IP at a profit. HMRC issued DPT notices to the claimants for 2018, using a ‘profit-split’ method to apportion the Swiss entity’s annual profit and its profit on the disposal in 2018 to Refinitiv – on the basis that the services that Refinitiv had provided had contributed to the profits generated by the IP assets and the profits on its disposal.
The claimants argued the UT had erred in law when it decided that the DPT notices were lawful as the APA only applied up to the accounting period ending 31 December 2014. They contended that the UT had failed to recognise and give proper effect to the APA in its relevant statutory context.
However, the Court disagreed. It found that the APA’s terms, including the agreed transfer pricing methodology, were limited to the specified periods and did not bind HMRC for future accounting periods. It rejected Refinitiv’s argument that the APA was drafted to apply to the “covered transactions” (which were still in place after the end of the APA), stating “I can find nothing in the language of the APA to support the notion that the agreed treatment should enjoy a potentially indefinite afterlife in future accounting periods once the term of the APA had come to an end”.
Accordingly, the Court found that the 2018 accounting period was not covered by the APA, and HMRC was entitled to issue DPT notices based on a different transfer pricing methodology. The appeal was unanimously dismissed.