Female naval architect in hardhat and coveralls taking measurement along bulwark of commercial tugboat

How tax can support supply chain resiliency and transformation

The tax function’s integration with supply chains offers the ability to incorporate diversity, transparency, innovation and sustainability.


In brief
  • Supply chains are subject to the greatest upheaval in a generation due to a range of factors including geopolitical tensions, climate change and conflict.
  • To future-proof supply chains, multinationals should enhance their resilience and agility, while aligning activity with their ESG objectives.
  • The tax function has a critical role to play in supply chain transformation by managing taxes and leveraging incentives.

Global supply chains are currently exposed to the highest levels of risk since the late 1980s, threatening critical trade flows and impacting multinationals’ cost base. The tax function is poised to help.

An increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) environment has been affecting global supply chains from every direction, and its triggers are continuously evolving.1 As a result, businesses are increasingly seeking stability and predictability through embedding resilience elements into the global value chains.
 

The latest WEF Global Risks Report 2024(pdf), which analyzes current global business risk, identifies extreme weather, conflict, cybercrime/Artificial Intelligence (AI) misuse, inflation, political/societal polarization and systemic supply chain disruption as among the biggest. Although “systemic supply chain disruptions” are identified as a separate risk, most other risks are likely to exacerbate aspects of the VUCA environment for global supply chains. Companies will need to proactively identify and address individual risk areas in a comprehensive manner, an effort that will reshape enterprises for the decades to come.

Tax leaders are very knowledgeable about managing the regulatory complexity of local territories and navigating controversies that may contribute to uncertain returns on investment from operating in new territories.

Increasingly, the tax function is playing a bigger role in helping organizations transform and reinforce critical nodes in business value chains to achieve resilience. It is also emerging as a strategic contributor to addressing identified risks and creating and maintaining supply chain resilience amid this growing VUCA environmental uncertainty.

 "Tax leaders are very knowledgeable about managing the regulatory complexity of local territories and navigating controversies that may contribute to uncertain returns on investment from operating in new territories," says Kelly Stals, Principal in International Tax and Transaction Services at Ernst & Young LLP. "These skills can be valuable when applied in the context of pursuing sustainable and resilience supply chains.”

Among other things, tax professionals can help identify opportunities to help manage costs, cash flows and improve after-tax results to help multinationals restructure and embed resilience into the supply chains.

Aerial view taken with drone flying above multiple lane highway crossing luxuriant infinite forest with plain horizon, next to, the Peerdsbos railway tunnel covered with solar pannels with kilometers long. Antwerp. Belgium
1

Chapter 1

Increasing complexity of the regulatory landscape

Businesses should increase transparency and accountability as part of an integrated ESG approach.

The increasing complexity of the global regulatory landscape, which includes green taxation and related regulations, has become a major new consideration that supply chain leaders should account for when planning for future shape and increased resilience of the supply chains. Green taxes and related regulations have the potential to adversely impact multinationals’ cost base, ability to trade and revenues. They are simultaneously giving rise to new trade-related compliance burdens. Hence, horizon scanning and planning for green taxes and related regulations is key for maintaining competitiveness, profitability, and growth.

The relative novelty of sustainability regulations brings uncertainty and ambiguity, with multinationals often struggling to identify and appraise current and upcoming regulatory requirements on their business. The interconnected nature of the global regulatory environment can often exacerbate this challenge with jurisdiction-specific rules potentially impacting operations in multiple countries, especially international trade-related regulations. Other cases include individual jurisdictions choosing to implement global or regional rules in different ways, for example when transposing an EU Directive into member states’ legislation.

Carbon pricing
carbon pricing initiatives in place globally.
Green taxes
green taxes in place globally.

Addressing regulatory, green taxation, and other complexities when managing risks and building supply chain resilience requires collaboration internally across business functions and externally across the full value chain.

Increased disclosure

Until recently, sustainable supply chains were a voluntary endeavor with multinationals greening their supplier networks to appeal to environmentally aware consumers and investors. Now, however, an uptick in regulation, green taxation, and transparency requirements means that polluting aspects and activities of supply chains either trigger potentially material taxes, levies and charges, require investment or need to be disclosed. In fact, if one focuses only on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions pricing related regulations, there are over 70 carbon pricing initiatives in place globally2, such as domestic carbon taxes and the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and more than 3,000 green taxes, levies and fees.

Meanwhile, jurisdictions are encouraging investments into more sustainable supply chains and materials through tax incentives, grants and financing opportunities, with more than 1,850 ESG tax incentives available globally, according to the latest quarterly EY Green Tax Tracker.

The European Parliament, for example, has recently adopted a wide range of sustainability regulations that will significantly impact organizations within the EU and outside the trading bloc. These include the CBAM, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), the EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D).

CBAM, which took effect in October 2023, effectively places a levy on imports of selective materials and products from the most carbon-intensive sectors such as cement, fertilizer, iron and steel, aluminum, electricity and hydrogen. CBAM’s impact is driven by several factors, including whether the exporting country has a carbon pricing regime with certain qualifying features, as well as the ability to contract directly for clean energy. CBAM is designed to address the risk of carbon leakage, which occurs when companies move production to countries with less stringent carbon policies or when locally made products are replaced with more carbon-intensive imports. It also is meant to encourage the setup of domestic carbon pricing regimes.

Meanwhile, EUDR covers specific cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soy, and wood products imported into, traded within, or exported from the EU. It aims to be sure that the production of these commodities hasn’t led to deforestation or forest degradation. It also checks that they were produced in compliance with local laws, including human rights, anti-corruption and tax, trade, and customs legislation. The regulation is effective from December 2024 and looks at land use change from December 2020.

The EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) is a part of the Circular Economy Action Plan and is considered one of the most transformational and disruptive pieces of the EU Green Deal package. It promotes product sustainability by imposing eco-design requirements on a wide range of products and sectors such as iron, steel, aluminum, textiles, chemicals, electronics products and similar goods. A key element of the ESPR is the Digital Product Passport (DPP), which requires digital reporting of comprehensive product information to stakeholders, facilitating environmental compliance management.

Human rights and environmental violations

Lastly, beginning in 2027, CS3D will aim to prevent and reduce human rights and environmental violations within an organization’s own operations, by subsidiaries, by upstream suppliers and by downstream suppliers in connection with the storage, distribution and transportation of goods.

ESG regulation
of attendees at a recent EY roundtable said that they were not confident their organizations are responding to complex ESG regulations.

Organizations must address social aspects, such as forced labor, exploitation of workers, child labor, just and favorable conditions of work, fair and adequate living wages, unequal treatment in employment, the right of freedom of association, and environmental aspects such as GHG emissions, deforestation, pollution, handing of hazardous wastes and chemicals, protection of the ozone layer, use of mercury, and water use.

Seventy percent of attendees at a recent EY roundtable said they were not confident or did not know how their organizations were responding to this complex and often overlapping patchwork of new ESG regulations.

Collaboration, internal and external, is key to making sense of this fast-evolving landscape and achieving sustainable supply chains. Internal collaboration includes key functions such as sustainability, procurement, legal and risk. The tax department also has a critical role to play in ensuring compliance with the current regulations and protecting the supply chain’s cost base. Tax can also, together with the regulatory team, highlight upcoming green taxes through horizon scanning, allowing executive management to plan and to identify links in the supply chain that may put value creation and the cost base at risk without appropriate planning and intervention.

For example, CBAM and EUDR compliance will require deep data-mining capabilities that will allow companies to trace the goods moving through their internal and external global value chain. The trade function needs to be able to identify raw materials, work in process, and finished inventories at a highly detailed level (by harmonized tariff schedule coding) to determine which regulatory frameworks they may fall under. Thereafter, a range of stakeholders, including tax, law, regulatory, the sustainability office and procurement, will address additional legislative and regulatory requirements and their application by individual countries.

Worker checks information at the container terminal
2

Chapter 2

Developing new business models and relocating supply chains

Resource scarcity and insecure access to raw materials is driving supply chain innovation.

A marked increase in conflict and geopolitical tension is undermining access to key materials, disrupting established global shipping routes and creating a risk of potential global resource scarcity. Increasing access uncertainty is causing companies to rethink their supply chains. For example, “servitization” and circular business models can help companies maintain “cradle to grave” ownership of scarce raw materials by reducing material and redesigning material use and products to use fewer resources. These models also turn waste into a resource, essentially recapturing it to be a resource for new materials and products, for example how plastic bottles can be collected and reprocessed into new products ranging from clothing to furniture to other packaging.

 

Alongside these new models, tighter and more integrated ways of interacting with suppliers, customers and new non-traditional trading partners involved in materials recovery, repairs and similar activities are taking hold. A wider re-evaluation of new corporate value-creating drivers is also underway.

 

Finally, innovation is surging related to developing substitutes for polluting, scarce, or vulnerable resource bases. For example, electric vehicle battery manufacturers faced with conflict in regions rich in raw materials such as lithium and cobalt are developing new products and recycling processes as well as sourcing from alternative locations. The tax issues related to this innovation are varied and critical. They include accessing incentives for research and development (R&D), determining which entities will fund the R&D, and who will own the resulting intellectual property (IP).


Circular business models 

Circular business models serve multiple positive environmental and social purposes, from reducing waste and aspects of pollution to extending the life of goods to recovering critical and scarce materials and facilitating their reuse. Circular economy business models such as recycling, reuse and refill processes tend to be based closer to the points of consumption due to high logistics costs which can lead to nearshoring. Furthermore, circular economy models tend to be more labor-intensive than the traditional linear business models, creating more local employment.
 

In general, more companies are re-examining and diversifying their supply chains in the context of growing global pressures. This may include reducing lead times, introducing multi-sourcing (removing single points of supply failure), re-designing sub-assemblies, and moving to vertical integration for critical materials as well as bringing their manufacturing footprint closer to their own borders.

US imports
imports to the US reached an all-time high in 2022, but the proportion from China fell from a high of 21.6% in 2017.

As a result of macro factors and new business models, there has been a gradual shift of activities from some well-established manufacturing centers to countries closer to suppliers or customers. The share of Chinese goods and services exported to the West, for example, has fallen in recent years, with the proportion of US imports originating from China dropping to 16.5% in 2022, down from a peak of 21.6% in 2017. This was not due to a downturn in global trade, as US imports reached an all-time high of US$3.2 trillion (about US$9,800 per person in the US) in 2022. Instead, the US replaced Chinese goods and services with imports from neighboring Mexico, among other locations.3

The central role of tax functions

Tax functions, with their oversight of tax environments across jurisdictions, have a central role to play in helping C-suites identify, model and choose the most suitable location(s) for purposes of diversifying and de-risking supply chains. Tax functions understand, and can model, tax regimes in different countries, from traditional direct and indirect taxes, sometimes even the international trade measures, to the newly emerging green taxation and continuously growing incentives and funding. Transfer pricing policies and pro-active controversy management strategies are contributing to the return of investment of often centrally developed and locally deployed innovations, including innovations related to improving the sustainability of supply chain operations.

According to Jay Camillo, EY Global Operating Model Effectiveness Leader, the role of a company’s tax function should include tracking taxes and tax incentives in target jurisdictions and understanding how they can help the wider organization design its optimal supply chain diversification strategy.

“If a multinational wants to relocate its plant or de-risk its supply chain by moving it to a new location, most countries are likely to welcome the investment with open arms,” Camillo says. “You can expect this to take the form of attractive tax incentives, investment credits and subsidies.” The UK, for example, offers R&D tax relief up to 186% while the US Inflation Reduction Act offers various tax incentives for firms investing in sustainable technology, with the EU Green Deal offering a blend of incentives, taxes and levies.

If a multinational wants to relocate its plant or de-risk its supply chain by moving it to a new location, most countries are likely to welcome the investment with open arms.

This is one area where tax professionals shouldn’t wait to be consulted but rather should work proactively with the C-suite to match operationally attractive jurisdictions with new strategically important tax incentives.

Aerial view of Container terminal in Shanghai, China.
3

Chapter 3

Aligning green and digital innovation to boost competitiveness

Innovation and incentives are key to realigning supply chains and reinvigorating industrial strategy.

Organizations faced with the challenge of redesigning their supply chains can embed sustainability and digital innovation, making them more resilient and ultimately, more competitive.
 

The tax function can address opportunities around new investments via incentives, model total landed costs estimates including customs duties and carbon cost, and plan for the appropriately balanced management and IP ownership model–between decentralized and centralized.
 

R&D incentives are among the important levers organizations can use to help lower the total cost of innovation efforts being undertaken to address ESG regulation, and, in part, to help reduce reliance on materials from high-risk markets. In 2023, 33 of the 38 OECD countries offered R&D tax credits, up from 19 in 2000.4 The tax function can position companies to benefit from these programs, which requires close collaboration with the business to ensure that the countries offering these incentives are ones where it is commercially feasible to establish R&D operations.
 

Depending on the criteria established by each country with regard to R&D tax incentives, these credits and other mechanisms can help companies cost efficiently build leading edge technologies, which can help future-proof supply chains and enhance overall efficiency. R&D tax incentives also often encourage companies to focus on sustainable practices and ethical sourcing, helping them comply with sustainability regulation and boosting their ESG profile.
 

To drive the greatest value, tax teams should be involved from the start of the R&D conversation, helping shape the organization’s IP strategy, identifying the potential locations for R&D to take place, deciding where ownership of IP should reside and how royalty payments should be structured to remunerate subsidiaries.

 

From this R&D foundation, a company can build out expertise around sales and operations planning, using new and fully diversified supply chains designed to reduce risk while fulfilling obligations to investors, regulators and other stakeholders.

 

Keeping track of the constantly changing global patchwork of R&D incentives may be beyond many tax teams, however. Companies are looking for an additional ear to the ground by using tracking tools like the EY Green Tax Tracker. This monitoring tool curates enacted sustainability incentives and exemptions collected by global and regional EY tax teams as well as identifies relevant tax developments.

Aerial view of stonecutters bridge and the tsing sha highway Hong kong
4

Chapter 4

The role of technology in pursuing the sustainability agenda

Data is key to achieving transparency, traceability and ESG compliance.

The use of ecosystem-wide data repositories and AI, enabling detailed data analysis and prediction are key requirements for successfully navigating the rapidly evolving VUCAs landscape. With greater real-time supply chain transparency, companies can better anticipate and withstand unforeseen disruptions to their operations.
 

Value chain transparency is greatly improved using technologies such as IOT sensors, blockchain and RFID tags that can track and generate data as goods and services flow through supply chains.

Companies need to be able to track and trace value flows through the full length of their supply chains.

Stals says that when organizations have detailed knowledge of how their supply chains are configured, they are better placed to identify risks, weaknesses, develop potential resilience strategies, establish redundancy and flexibility, and respond to and recover from unanticipated risks or disruptions. Furthermore, it enables them to be compliant.

Tax authorities are also gaining increasing visibility over supply chain transactions to ensure appropriate amounts of VAT and customs duties are being remitted.

“While tax authorities are using big data analytics to search for compliance, companies are using the same technology to predict supply chain disturbance and calculate the downstream impact on sales and operational planning,” Camillo says. “Tax teams also want transparency so they can track trade, ESG aspects and taxes, and other elements of their compliance role, while at the same time looking for opportunities to layer on emerging ESG tax and incentives benefits resulting from rapidly changing supply chains.”

Supply chain transparency can help tax functions achieve two major objectives. The first is improved governance of the existing business structure, monitoring exposure to existing and upcoming (green) tax positions and maintaining compliance. The second benefit is identification and utilization of opportunities such as tax incentives. This is only possible, however, if tax functions are actively involved in operational decisions.

Multinationals will increasingly need to know where their supply chain are exposed to carbon and environmental levies and taxes, currently and in the future.

"The majority of companies are in the process of comprehensively assessing the impact of their activities on the environment and society and also the impact of current and upcoming green taxes, regulations and incentives on their business,” says Alenka Turnsek, EY Global Sustainability Tax Policy Leader. “Multinationals will increasingly need to know where their value chains are exposed to environmental levies and taxes and other impacts. That’s where the tax function comes in.”

Turnsek says that more companies are starting to analyze the different layers of their supply chains, both upstream and downstream. This includes building data repositories for value chain-wide data with their customers and suppliers and applying technology such as data analytics and AI to generate insights. These efforts are intended to support redesigning their strategy and governance around managing green taxes, incentives in the context of achieving wider sustainability goals. By aligning (green) tax considerations with sustainability goals, companies can redefine engagements within the existing supply ecosystems and collaborate with new partners. Newly forged alliances and redefined engagements with existing stakeholders will put companies in a better position to improve resilience, adapt to regulatory change and the VUCA environment to drive sustainable growth.


Summary

Creating diversified, transparent, and sustainable supply chains is imperative for multinational enterprises. Collaboration with the tax function will reveal opportunities that enable businesses to radically reimagine their supply chains while managing risks and remaining compliant.

Related articles

How integrating tax and trade can improve supply chain performance

Amid myriad disruptions, a data-driven model helps integrate supply chain, tax, and trade to improve global supply chain performance. Read more.

How the great supply chain reset is unfolding

Companies are making their supply chains more cost-efficient, resilient and sustainable in an increasingly uncertain world. Learn how.

    About this article