Over the last 10 years, cloud computing has become one of the most important innovations in financial services, promising lower costs and greater flexibility, as well as increased resilience and security. Although some organisations have realised these benefits, most have not.
Perhaps most disappointing has been the failure to realise the potential cost savings, which were the most enticing part of the business case for cloud adoption. In some instances, organisations have exceeded their target cloud budgets by 50% or more.¹
Given these shortfalls, many IT leaders have sought a better way. FinOps is a holistic approach to governing and operating large-scale cloud environments, which has produced strong outcomes across many industries and regions. In other words, it has delivered the results and value companies were looking for when they first ventured into the cloud.
The FinOps: how to keep cloud costs under control report (PDF) explores the reasons behind high cloud computing costs and why FinOps offers an answer, giving organisations a powerful and proven way to manage their cloud costs, optimise their cloud resources and enhance the overall governance of their cloud environments.
Why the cloud doesn’t always reduce IT costs
The high costs of cloud computing are not an isolated issue. An EY survey of IT leaders found that 57% of organisations have surpassed their annual cloud budgets² and 72% have moved at least one enterprise application back on premise.³ Research from Gartner has suggested that 30% of all cloud spend is wasted⁴ – a staggering figure, given that hundreds of billions of dollars are spent on cloud software and services around the globe every year.
So why have computing costs remained high? There are a number of reasons, from outdated budgeting and accounting processes and limited visibility into the full cloud spend to lack of alignment between finance, procurement and IT. Moreover, there is a lack of expertise within many companies to analyse and optimise cloud costs.
Additionally, the widespread perception of cloud computing as extremely inexpensive, combined with the cloud’s ability to elastically scale resources, can lead to unpleasant surprises. Indeed, rising cloud costs are particularly tricky to manage, because the underlying causes are inextricably linked to the cloud’s strengths and the consequent desire for organisations to consume more resources compared to traditional IT. Consumption spend will spiral quickly out of control if usage is not measured and monitored continuously.
Another factor has been the inability of organisations to adjust their working styles and approach to design solutions. Specifically, cost implications are not prioritised or even reviewed during approval processes. In many situations, the business case for cloud migration only includes a simplified run cost estimate.
Overlapping costs represent another commonly overlooked risk. For example, cloud consumption cost is incurred once migration begins, whilst existing costs may remain in place. For instance, organisations that don’t take action to “turn off” on-premise infrastructure or redeploy application support teams may find themselves paying for legacy systems and services for far longer than necessary. Again, all of these costs can negatively affect the projected savings.