Recent Searches
Cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are declining as a share of the total M&A market, in part due to rising government interventions aimed at supporting and building strategic industries domestically. The pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors are becoming a focus of geostrategic activity, with a variety of governments implementing policies to ensure economic security in these areas.
This edition of Geostrategic Analysis also discusses the potential for increased strategic investment and regulatory uncertainty that will likely follow the European Parliament elections, the likely business impacts of the Mexican election, heightened shipping risks from South China Sea tensions, and sustainability challenges from rising electricity demand in data centers.
In the monthly EY Geostrategic Analysis, the EY Geostrategic Business Group (GBG) provides its insights on key geopolitical developments. Each issue includes our take on recent or upcoming political risk events and what they mean for global business. Subscribe Now
Topic 1
Geopolitics is increasingly shaping the landscape of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A)
How EY-Parthenon can help
The Geostrategic Business Group can help translate geopolitical insights into business strategy to help manage political risk. Find out how.
Read moreHeightened tensions and trade conflicts between major economic powers in recent years have led to increased scrutiny and regulatory barriers for cross-border deals involving sensitive industries or technologies. Governments are becoming more proactive about protecting their strategic industries, hampering the free flow of capital and investment across borders.1
Cross-border M&A is decelerating. Since 2000, 30% of deals by value have been cross-border, but this has been trending downward in recent years. Between 2007 and 2011, cross-border M&As accounted for an average of 34% of annual totals by value, but only 26% from 2020 to 2024.
As more governments seek to build and expand strategic industries, geopolitical influences on cross-border M&A are likely to persist and potentially intensify. There will be further pressure on cross-border deals between geopolitical and economic adversaries. But this situation could also increase investment flows between more closely aligned countries.
New and more stringent policies are in process in many jurisdictions. In the US, for instance, a recent proposed rule would expand the scope of information the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS) can demand regarding inbound transactions not filed with CFIUS.2 And changes to Australia’s foreign investment regime will tighten rules for deals involving infrastructure, resources and technology.3
Following an executive order in August 2023, the US may issue regulations to restrict outbound investment.4 The EU recently concluded a consultation period regarding potential restrictions on outbound investments in critical technologies.5 These and other policy changes globally will create extra uncertainties for multinational corporations seeking to expand through acquisitions.
Other geopolitical risks – such as the potential for new sanctions, tariffs and export controls – have made it more challenging to assess the potential risks and rewards of cross-border deals. This uncertain environment will likely continue to extend the timelines for deals to get approved and lead some companies to adopt a more cautious approach.
Major sectors affected include Defense, technology, critical infrastructure, energy (especially renewables), automotive, industrials and agriculture.
How EY-Parthenon can help
Discover M&A advisory services from EY when you buy and integrate. We help enable strategic growth through integrated mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances.
Read moreAs governments prioritize national security and economic sovereignty, the regulatory environment will continue to be increasingly complex and unpredictable. Companies should prepare for an increasingly political approval process, making due diligence more intricate and time-consuming.
Companies in the most strategic sectors need to understand not only current regulatory requirements but also the direction in which policy is heading and incorporate that into decisions about the location of operational assets or capital allocation.
Companies in sectors that are becoming more strategic for governments should consider making acquisitions now before greater scrutiny and higher barriers are introduced.
For more information, contact Barry Perkins
Topic 2
Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology are increasingly targeted as a geostrategic sector
How EY-Parthenon can help
EY-Parthenon Health and Wellness Strategy Consulting teams help develop and deliver growth, transaction, digital and value creation strategies. We help health and life sciences organizations build greater financial and operational resilience and technical agility, supporting their future growth within an ever-changing landscape.
Read moreChina included biological medicines and medical devices as key industries in which it aims to become self-reliant in its 14th Five-Year Plan (2020-2025). In the “two sessions” legislative plenaries in March 2024, President Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of “new quality productive forces” including biotechnology.
In mid-May, a US House of Representatives committee passed an amended version of the US BIOSECURE Act, which, amongst other provisions, bars companies from US government contracts if they do business with prohibited entities, with a 2032 deadline to wind down any existing relationships.6 A Senate committee passed similar legislation in March.
In February, President Biden issued an executive order to prevent the bulk transfer of Americans’ sensitive personal data, including genomic data, biometric data and personal health data, to countries of concern.7
Governments are likely to continue to treat biotechnology and advanced pharmaceuticals as a strategic sector, leading to more de-risking and economic security policies affecting the sector.
In the US, the BIOSECURE Act will continue to move through the legislative process and is likely to be enacted in some form later this year. Washington could also introduce more restrictions on cross-border trade and investment in biotech with countries seen as geopolitical competitors, and possibly industrial policies to promote greater domestic innovation in and manufacturing of these products.
China will continue to build the infrastructure to develop its domestic biotech industry, including a talent pool, investment and regulatory policies that support the growth of home-grown corporations. In response to US actions, China could consider introducing export restrictions for the raw ingredients needed for key drug supplies (it manufactures about 40% of the global supply of active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs).
India and Vietnam stand to benefit from the diversification of life sciences manufacturing. The United States-India Trade Policy Forum, for instance, recently focused on the opportunity to de-risk and diversify the global pharmaceutical supply chain.8 And Vietnam will continue to implement a 2023 initiative to develop the country’s pharmaceutical industry by 2030.9
Pharmaceutical companies should evaluate their global manufacturing and supply chain strategies and assess whether they need to adjust to emerging geopolitical dynamics. Establishing or expanding supply chains with contract drug manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) in countries with favorable ties to governments in their consumer markets is likely to be a common strategy.
There may be M&A opportunities associated with the implementation of the BIOSECURE Act or similar legislation in other markets, as such laws could result in some foreign companies selling facilities to third parties – private equity, competing CDMOs, or another biopharma company – to continue operating.
Topic 3
European Parliament outlook; Mexican election; South China Sea tensions
How EY-Parthenon can help
EY-Parthenon professionals recognize that CEOs and business leaders are tasked with achieving maximum value for their organizations’ stakeholders in this transformative age. We challenge assumptions to design and deliver strategies that help improve profitability and long-term value.
Read more
On June 6-9, EU citizens will elect a new European Parliament. Populist right-wing parties are expected to gain ground over center-left and green parties, capitalizing on a growing populist trend which could also translate into higher-than-usual voter turnout. The center-right European People’s Party (EPP) – expected to remain the biggest party in the parliament – is expected to continue working with center-left (S&D) and liberal (Renew) parties to advocate for more investment in domestic defense and clean technology production but could occasionally side with the populist right to push back on unpopular legislation, such as around new environmental rules.
EU-based companies should expect continued support for investment in strategic sectors including clean technologies (e.g., electric vehicles, renewables), advanced technologies and defense through both EU-wide and national-level funding and regulatory incentives. In parallel, the EU will likely continue to defend domestic strategic industries from certain foreign competitors and restrict foreign investment in critical products. Moreover, delays to some environmental legislation (e.g., ESG reporting) could provide some companies with more time to adjust their business to the new rules but would also increase uncertainty for financial projections and long-term investment strategies.
For more information, contact Famke Krumbmüller
How EY-Parthenon can help
The Geostrategic Business Group can help translate geopolitical insights into business strategy to help manage political risk. Find out how.
Read more
The Mexican elections on 2 June were the country’s largest ever, with more than 20,000 federal and local seats up for grabs and all 32 states holding concurrent elections. In the presidential race, Claudia Sheinbaum of the ruling Morena party won against her main rival, Senator Xóchitl Gálvez of the Broad Front for Mexico coalition.10 Morena and its coalition parties also won a majority in both houses of Congress – although it is not yet clear if Morena and its allies secured a two-thirds “supermajority” of seats in both houses. A supermajority in Congress would allow Morena to amend the constitution, which would be necessary to enact some of the reforms on its agenda.
Sheinbaum is expected to continue many of the policies of current Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador (also known by his initials, AMLO), including an emphasis on public security, infrastructure development and expansion of executive power. Sheinbaum has also discussed the importance of promoting the transition to renewable energy – in part as a way to continue to attract foreign investment and maintain the momentum of the nearshoring trend. Investment opportunities associated with the nearshoring agenda are therefore likely to persist in the manufacturing and technology sectors. However, the market’s initial reaction to Morena’s victory suggested there may be hesitancy among investors due to the party’s potential to pass significant reforms.
How EY-Parthenon can help
Discover how EY's supply chain team can help your business redefine its end-to-end supply chain and operations to support your enterprise objectives.
Read moreAccelerating geostrategic competition over access to key maritime terrain and natural resources is heightening tensions in the South China Sea. Over the past few months, China and the Philippines have intensified efforts to reinforce their respective claims to locations in the Spratly Islands and Second Thomas Shoal.11 Concurrently, some countries in the region are trying to increase access to local natural resources. For example, growing energy demands are prompting Malaysia to expand oil exploration and production at locations in disputed waters.
Roughly one-third of global maritime trade passes through the South China Sea. Recent incidents at sea and the increasing presence of ships from various countries have soured diplomatic relations and prompted escalation concerns. A rise in shipping insurance coverage rates is possible, which would impose higher global shipping costs for companies heavily reliant on maritime deliveries. Companies may also face shipping delays and damage to or loss of cargos and vessels if tensions escalate. Businesses dependent on shipping through the sea should both closely monitor what remains a dynamic, evolving situation and ensure that transportation contingency plans are up to date.
Topic 4
Expected rise in electricity demand from data centers, cryptocurrencies and AI
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), in 2022, data centers, cryptocurrency operations and artificial intelligence (AI) accounted for about 2% of the world's electricity usage, consuming 460 terawatt-hours (TWh).12 The rapid integration of AI into software development across various industries is driving up the energy requirements of data centers. The IEA projects that by 2026, the power usage of data centers, including those serving cryptocurrency and AI, will nearly double.
How EY-Parthenon can help
EY sustainability and ESG strategy consulting teams can help you with strategy, M&A, capital allocation, ESG due diligence and portfolio optimization.
Read moreThe EY 2024 Geostrategic Outlook similarly highlights that the technology sector’s energy consumption is likely to increase significantly due to AI's intensive data processing requirements. This raises some risks associated with sustainability and broader environmental impacts.
Sustainability challenges could impact companies in other sectors that rely on data centers, particularly if they are required to report scope 3 emissions. In response, some tech firms are investigating in alternative energy options, including the construction of their own zero-emission power facilities. More broadly, the surging electricity demands of data centers creates the need for an expansion in renewable energy sources and improvements in power grids.
Additional EY contributors to this article include Lisa LaMotta, Ari B Saks Gonzalez, Alexander Acho and Jay T. Young.
Geostrategic Analysis
Register for the Editor’s Picks newsletter to receive the monthly Geostrategic Analysis and other transformative insights from EY.
Middle East tensions, the geopolitics of deep-sea mining, elections in South Africa and more.
Geopolitical competition over EV, US data security regulations, China’s innovation, India’s election and more
Disagreement at the WTO, global interest rates, Indonesia’s election, a rise in armed conflicts, and more.
The EY Geostrategic Business Group (GBG) provides its take on key geopolitical developments and the impact of these political risks on international business. Each monthly EY Geostrategic Analysis issue includes assessments of recent or upcoming geopolitical risk events and what they mean for companies across sectors and geographies.
Prepare now for the new era of selective globalization
Exploring scenarios for the world in five years reveals divergent paths for geopolitics, economic policies and company strategies. Learn more.
Top 10 geopolitical developments for 2024
An even more complex geopolitical environment is on the horizon. Learn how businesses need to innovate and adapt their strategies to stay ahead.
Top 10 risks and opportunities for mining and metals companies in 2025
An EY survey of mining companies shows transformation is critical, requiring innovation, collaboration and agility to reshape the future with confidence.
