7 minute read 8 Jun 2020
Variable capital companies

Variable Capital Companies: a new opportunity for asset managers and lessons for India

By Sameer Gupta

EY India Tax Leader

Sameer’s professional expertise lies in investments structuring, corporate tax and regulatory advisory and compliance services.

7 minute read 8 Jun 2020
Related topics Tax Tax planning

Show resources

The Variable Capital Companies (VCC) is a significant chapter in the development of Singapore as a full-service international fund management and domiciliation hub.

Singapore’s central bank, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) launched the Variable Capital Companies (VCC) framework on 14 January 2020, to constitute investment funds across traditional and alternative strategies.

The VCC is a significant chapter in the development of Singapore as a full-service international fund management and domiciliation hub. VCCs are set to make Singapore an even more attractive fund management hub by providing fund managers with greater flexibility on the domiciliation of extensive range of investment funds. The VCC structure is tailored for collective investment schemes whether open ended or close ended, traditional as well as alternative be it private equity, hedge fund or real estate. The framework provides greater operational flexibility and cost savings and should give Singapore a distinct advantage and is expected to enable its fund management industry to leapfrog from good to great.

Overview of VCCs

VCCs are a corporate structure that can be set-up as a standalone fund or an umbrella fund with multiple sub-funds. Below are some key features of the framework:

  • Regulated by MAS and ACRA
  • VCCs can be incorporated with minimum of one shareholder. The shares of a VCC have no par value and actual value of the paid-up capital of the VCC is, at all times, equal to the NAV of the VCC
  • Ring-fencing of sub-funds under an umbrella fund structure, i.e., assets and liabilities of each sub-fund would always be segregated
  • VCC not restricted to paying dividends only out of profits as is the case with companies
  • There are no capital maintenance requirements
  • Every VCC must have an investment manager[1] who in turn would be regulated by the MAS in Singapore
  • Flexibility to prepare financial statements as per internationally accepted methods
  • Members may also redeem and sell their shares back to the VCC to exit their investment
  • VCCs may only have one director subject to fulfilment of various conditions prescribed
  • As per the framework, MAS would also provide information to foreign and domestic authorities in order to enable them to verify if the Anti Money Laundering (AML)/Countering Financing of Terrorism (CFT) requirements are adequately met by the VCCs
  • From a tax standpoint, VCCs are considered as a single entity for Singapore tax purposes and should be eligible to access Singapore’s tax treaty network. Existing tax incentives such as remission of GST, as well as lower tax of 10% on the fund manager, will be available in the context of a VCC

Owing to the above features, the said framework would provide fund managers with a greater choice of investment fund vehicles in Singapore that cater to the needs of global investment funds and investors. Fund managers would now be encouraged to use Singapore as a master fund platform, certainly for Asian investors but also for the American and European investors who have historically preferred jurisdictions such as Cayman Islands, Luxembourg or Ireland. To the existing structures located in the above countries, VCC regime also contains provisions to re-domicile in Singapore subject to various criteria prescribed by the MAS.

The Indian context

Singapore has evolved as a prominent global hub for the asset management industry, with its assets under management (AUM) close to US$2.5 trillion[2]. It has also emerged as one of the top investing countries into India, with a cumulative foreign direct investment (FDI) exceeding US$91 billion[3] over the years and portfolio (FPI) investment currently exceeding US$43 billion[4].

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has recently introduced the new FPI regulations 2019 under which a foreign fund will be eligible to a Category 1 FPI license, if either the fund or the fund manager is located in a Financial Action Task Force (FATF) member country and is appropriately regulated by the securities market regulator in the home country.  The slight nuance in the context of VCCs is that they are regulated by ACRA, which is the regulator for companies in Singapore. The fund manager is however regulated by MAS, which is the securities market regulator. On that basis, the SEBI should consider regarding the VCCs as eligible to a Category I FPI license.

From a tax standpoint, while the India-Singapore tax treaty has been revised to do away with the capital gains tax exemption on sale of shares of an Indian company, it continues to exempt gains from other financial instruments (i.e., bonds, debentures, derivatives instruments, etc.). Singapore always provided a compelling story for fund managers looking to establish themselves in the Asia-Pacific region, given its political and legal certainty, as well as the thriving services sector supporting the asset management industry. The VCC framework with its ability to pool monies directly from investors in Singapore should thus, significantly strengthen the basis for choice of Singapore as a location for the fund and strengthen the case for treaty access in this post-General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR) and post-Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS) Multilateral Instruments (MLI) era.

Lessons for India

The Indian fund management industry has grown leaps and bounds since the economic liberalization of the country in 1991. The assets of the mutual fund industry today stand at US$0.39 trillion[5]. Together with the growth in AUM, there has been a strong development of talent in the Indian mutual fund industry with the capability to manage foreign pools of capital. The total FPI investment into the country stands at US$500 billion[6] and there is potential for a significant portion of that to be managed from India. The Economic Survey estimated that number to be US$136 billion[7] in total assets. Additionally, the Economic Survey also estimated a further US$82 billion6 of private equity assets that also has the potential to be managed from India.

The introduction of the AIF Regulations by SEBI in 2012 has been another inflection point in the asset management industry with the total assets under custody of AIFs growing to US$13.65 billion[8] in a short period of time, attracting significant domestic as well as foreign participation. 

While the government and SEBI deserve credit for the huge growth of the fund management industry, more reforms in the context of the asset management industry would be necessary to bring back momentum lost as a result of the disruption in capital markets caused by Covid-19. Some of the reforms which the government and SEBI may consider are as under:

  • Removal of restrictive conditions in section 9A of the Income tax Act to encourage management of offshore funds by talent in India. 
  • Introducing a specific tax regime for Category III AIFs to provide clarity on their tax treatment
  • Exemption from GST on management fees on the portion of foreign money pooled into an AIF
  • Granting exemption from indirect transfer provisions to all FPIs (whether Category I or II) as well to foreign vehicles which invest under the FDI route (there is basis to deal with this issue as the investing entities are already taxable on the direct transfer).
  • Merger of NRI-PIS route to encourage greater NRI participation in the India growth story

As Singapore marches ahead on further globalizing its asset management industry, India too, can step up the game by adopting the reforms mentioned.

This is an opportune time for bringing in further reforms in the sector which will encourage greater domestic as well as foreign participation, boost employment and provide an overall impetus to the ‘Make in India’ vision for the financial services sector.
Mr. Umang Papneja
CIO & Senior Managing Partner, IIFL Wealth Management Ltd.

Show resources

(This article is co-authored by Tejas Desai, Tax Partner - Financial Services, EY India).

Summary

The Variable Capital Companies (VCCs) structure is a significant chapter in the development of Singapore as a full-service international fund management and domiciliation hub.

About this article

By Sameer Gupta

EY India Tax Leader

Sameer’s professional expertise lies in investments structuring, corporate tax and regulatory advisory and compliance services.

Related topics Tax Tax planning