Cost-of-living relief at the expense of fiscal repair
From the Chief Economist
The 2025-26 Federal Budget was firmly targeted at helping households ahead of the soon-to-be-announced election, with additional tax cuts and new spending all about easing the cost of living. But this came at the cost of fiscal repair and business assistance. Some minor fiscal repairs were welcome, but not enough to prevent net debt from rising further or the structural deficit from worsening.
As with all the Albanese Government Budgets, the broad strategy has been to give back upside surprises to the bottom line. This means the overall fiscal profile is largely unchanged from that outlined in the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) in December last year, although there is some additional “off-balance sheet” spending which make the overall impact of the fiscal policy on the economy slightly more stimulatory. A $27.6 billion underlying cash deficit in the current fiscal year grows to a $42.1 billion deficit next year. The deficit is expected to improve slightly to $35.7 billion in 2026-27 and remain similar in the next two years as well.
Over the five years to 2028-29, there will be an extra $34.9 billion of additional spending or tax cuts, which has been facilitated by $36.4 billion of upward revisions due to the better than forecast economy.
The political barriers to keeping spending tight were lower in this Budget than the last three, given the inflation forecasts were right in middle of the Reserve Bank’s target band at 2.5 per cent by the June quarter. Economically though, with deficits forecast for many years, and the economy not entirely out of the inflation woods, indiscriminate cost-of-living help, such as the electricity rebates and a policy to lower the cost of PBS prescriptions, were not well enough targeted.
Personal income tax cuts and an expansion of the low-income threshold for the Medicare levy, at a cost of $17.7 billion over the three years to 2028-29, were the Budget’s centrepiece. Starting on 1 July 2026, they are mild enough and far enough away to not worry the Reserve Bank and will have the welcome impact of lowering average tax rates for workers, giving back some of bracket creep that would otherwise have eaten into households' disposable incomes. The change marginally lowered the projected tax to GDP ratio to 23.4 per cent by 2027-28, after it had been forecast at 23.5 per cent by that year in MYEFO.
Two policies developed and enacted recently by the Government have lowered spending cost growth for the National Disability Insurance Scheme and the Aged Care sector, a recognition that some areas of spending needed to be brought under control. But at the same time, there was $8.5 billion more devoted to Medicare and $1.8 billion for infrastructure investment. Real growth in payments is forecast to rise by only 3 per cent in 2025-26 and 0.5 per cent in 2026-27 which implies an extremely disciplined Government in the next two financial years despite the many demands on Government.
A new policy with no cost to the Budget is the elimination of non-compete clauses for workers earning less than the high-income threshold in the Fair Work Act which is currently $175,000 per annum. This should ease the movement of employees across the workforce, a factor that should marginally assist labour productivity growth and have positive wage implications for some affected workers.
Disappointingly, there was no substantial assistance to make Australian businesses more competitive in the global economy. Nor were there tax incentives for innovative practices. On tax, the Government continues to avoid structural reform meaning a high proportion of Australia's tax revenues come from income, as opposed to consumption, which results in disincentives to earning.