How the big tax reboot may impact singapore

How the big tax reboot may impact Singapore

Photographic portrait of Chester Wee
Chester Wee

EY Asean International Tax and Transaction Services Leader

5 minute read 20 May 2021
Related topics
Tax
Tax transparency
Tax controversy
Tax compliance
Tax planning

The country will need to review its tax rates and policies should the proposed global minimum tax on profits become a reality.

In brief

  • The BEPS 2.0 project’s Pillar Two blueprint proposes a global minimum tax on profits.
  • As spending on COVID-19 economic stimuli and related support increases, governments will be under pressure to further drive revenues and tax rates.
  • Given these factors, Singapore will need to adapt its tax policies and play to other competitive strengths to remain an attractive investment destination.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has been working relentlessly toward achieving a global consensus on the design of a new international tax architecture. On 12 October 2020, the OECD released its reports on the blueprints of the two-pillar approach to address the tax challenges arising from digitalization of the economy (that is, the BEPS 2.0 project). The Pillar One blueprint rethinks the profit allocation of large multinational enterprises (MNEs) among jurisdictions, expanding the taxing rights of market jurisdictions based on revised nexus rules. On the other hand, the Pillar Two blueprint proposes a global minimum tax for which profits ought to be taxed.

Getting a broad consensus on the proposals appeared bleakly possible until US treasury secretary, Janet Yellen, made a similar call. The Biden tax proposals sought to, inter alia, enact a country-by-country minimum tax that aims to substantially curtail profit shifting and offshoring of assets by US MNEs, and deny tax deductions on related party payments to foreign corporations residing in a regime that has not implemented a strong minimum tax.

The need to pivot

Generally, the corporate tax rate is reflective of a country’s level of government spending and budgetary position. The table below shows the general government spending and general government deficit as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) in OECD countries as well as their combined corporate income tax rates in 2018.

By comparison, Singapore has a relatively low corporate tax rate of 17%. Its ratio of government expenditure to GDP and budget balance in relation to GDP in 2018 are shown in the table below. The country has long maintained a strict fiscal discipline, allowing it to maintain a competitive corporate tax rate and use tax incentives as a tool to attract foreign direct investment for job creation.

The 2018 situation seen earlier is expected to have changed with increased government spending on COVID-19 economic stimuli and related support, and governments will invariably be compelled to look more keenly at driving revenues and tax rates.

For example, the Netherlands has cancelled its planned reduction in corporate tax rate to 21.7% (from 25%) as of 1 January 2021, while Turkey, the UK and the US have unveiled plans for tax hikes. The prolonged road to recovery from this pandemic will engender tax hikes, new taxes, heightened tax enforcements and increased cross-border tax controversies. Understandingly, many OECD and G20 countries would support the global minimum tax proposal to prevent a race to the bottom: a tax competition many countries cannot afford.

Should this anticipated global minimum tax — or a tax reboot — materialize, it will inevitably limit Singapore’s choices in setting its own tax policies and indirectly challenge its sovereign rights. As a small city-state, Singapore will have to adapt and adjust its tax policies to fit into the new tax world.

Singapore will be compelled to review its choices in setting tax policiesthat make it attractive to investors, should a global minimum tax rate on profits materialize.

Explore our Offerings

  • BEPS 2.0

    Getting ready for global minimum taxes: EY can help you evaluate the impact on your organization and develop a robust, actionable plan. Learn more.

    Read more

BEPS 2.0 as a certainty

Under the current circumstances, BEPS 2.0 will be implemented in one form or another and the impact on the broader economy, investments, investment returns and jobs will remain to be seen.

 

Even with the appropriate economic substance, the global push for a minimum tax is likely to make paying zero or little taxes and parking profits in tax havens a thing of the past. MNEs must come to terms with this reality and brace themselves for a higher effective tax rate (ETR) wherever they operate.

 

In simple terms, the ETR is the percentage of earnings that a corporation pays in taxes. It drops when certain earnings are not taxable or taxed at a preferential tax rate, or when deductions are enhanced. Conversely, it rises with a denial of deductions or double taxation. As a result, the ETR can fluctuate year-on-year depending on the circumstances. In the BEPS 2.0 world, when the ETR falls below the agreed minimum tax rate, the “low-taxed profit” may consequently be picked up for tax elsewhere.

 

Some countries, such as Austria, India, South Korea and the US, have introduced some form of alternative minimum tax (AMT) in their tax regimes. AMT ensures that corporate earnings are subject to tax at a certain floor rate, and such a regime may help Singapore avoid any unintentional relinquishment of taxing rights when BEPS 2.0 is in place. The introduction of AMT could, however, increase the administrative burden on Singapore taxpayers. Simplifying the rules, such as aligning the ETR computation with that of the BEPS 2.0 proposal, will help with Singapore’s tax competitiveness.

 

The big tax reboot will transform the game for Singapore, where tax incentives have been instrumental to its investment promotion efforts. Having said that, Singapore’s long-standing merits in its institutions, infrastructure, labor market and financial and legal systems should continue to make it an attractive investment destination. As uncertainty looms around the world, may Singapore’s consistent performance and stable government policies keep this city-state shining as brightly as ever.

 

This article was first published in The Business Times on 12 May 2021.

Summary

The BEPS 2.0 project’s Pillar Two proposal for a global minimum tax on profits has heightened global uncertainty.

Singapore, which maintains a competitive tax rate and uses tax incentives to draw foreign direct investment, will have to adapt and adjust its tax policies if the proposal materializes. It is therefore important for the country to continue maintaining its long-standing merits in its institutions, infrastructure, labor market as well as financial and legal systems.

About this article

Photographic portrait of Chester Wee
Chester Wee

EY Asean International Tax and Transaction Services Leader

Trusted business advisor with a focus on cross-border taxation. Passionate about tax and people development. Thinker. Lego collector. Orchid lover. Father of three little rascals.
Related topics
Tax
Tax transparency
Tax controversy
Tax compliance
Tax planning

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.