Australian public country-by-country reporting Bill progress update

  • The Senate Economics Legislation Committee has recommended that Parliament pass the Bill that includes public country-by-country reporting measures.
  • New disclosures apply in respect of financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2024 to certain groups that have more than AU$1b revenue, subject to a de minimis Australian income exemption and scope to apply for certain other exemptions.
  • Disclosure is on a country-by-country basis for Australia and specified jurisdictions, while aggregation of information is allowed for other jurisdictions.
  • Significant penalties apply for noncompliance.
 

Executive summary

The Senate Economics Legislation Committee's (SELC) recommendation in its report dated 2 August 2024, that Parliament pass a Bill1 that includes the proposed Australian public country-by-country reporting measures (PCbCR), has moved these measures another step closer to reality.

Australia's PCbCR requires certain large Australian groups and Australian and foreign-owned multinational enterprises (MNEs) to prepare certain information on a country-by-country (CbC) basis for public release by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) for the 2024/25 and later financial years.2

Australia's public CbCR regime will be the most comprehensive PCbCR regime globally and additional work will be required by covered groups to comply compared to disclosures for confidential CbCR and under the European Union (EU) PCbCR directive. Significant administrative penalties may apply for late lodgment and criminal penalties may apply for noncompliance in some circumstances.

The measures are part of the Government's Multinational Tax Integrity and Transparency Plan announced in the 2022-23 Federal Budget (following its election commitment). They follow the new financial statement additional disclosure of subsidiary information measures — including the obligation to disclose a subsidiary's tax residence — that Australian public companies must satisfy, applicable from the 2023/24 year.

The SELC's report following its inquiry into the Bill was published on 2 August 2024. The Bill was introduced in Parliament on 5 June 2024 and is currently before the Senate. After considering submissions, the SELC concluded that the PCbCR (and the other Bill measures) should be passed as introduced.

The Bill includes a limited number of changes from the second exposure draft issued in February 2024. In particular, unchanged aspects include the information to be disclosed, the compulsory use of statutory financial statements and the commencement date.

The proposed rules are very wide in scope and will require careful review by affected groups to determine their application and potentially significant work to ensure systems are in place to comply with these new reporting obligations.

Notwithstanding the timeline for providing the first reports (i.e., for financial reporting periods starting on or after 1 July 2024), groups must understand now if they will be subject to the disclosures and should start implementing systems to capture and report the required information, which will potentially involve teams across multiple jurisdictions, before the end of the first reporting year.

Key features
  • The measures apply to financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2024.
  • They apply to the ultimate parent entity of certain Australian groups and MNEs that have a presence in Australia and global consolidated revenue in excess of AU$1b. This includes Australian groups with solely domestic operations.
  • De minimis — An entity is only subject to reporting if AU$10m or more of their aggregated (global) turnover for the income year is Australian-sourced.
  • Aggregation of required information is allowed for a jurisdiction unless a jurisdiction is designated as a specified jurisdiction. The list of specified jurisdictions is currently significantly longer than that in the EU PCbCR rules and includes Hong Kong, Switzerland and Singapore.
  • Exemptions from disclosing some or all information may be granted on a class or entity basis.
  • Significant penalties will apply for not providing the required information on time. In addition, criminal penalties may apply in certain situations.
  • Covered entities must publish the selected tax information on an Australian government website by providing the Commissioner of Taxation (the Commissioner) with the information in an approved form within 12 months of the end of the relevant financial year. The Commissioner will then facilitate publication.
  • Covered entities must notify the ATO of any material errors in that published information within 28 days of becoming aware of them and provide the correct information. Failure to do so attracts the same penalties as mentioned above. Entities may also correct any other non-material errors.
Affected groups

The new legislation applies to the ultimate parent entity (the CbC-reporting parent) of MNEs and purely domestic Australian groups that have annual global consolidated income (i.e., revenue) in excess of AU$1b in the previous year, where:

  • The CbC-reporting parent is a member of a CbC-reporting group
  • At any time during the reporting period, the CbC-reporting parent or another member of the CbC-reporting group is either
    • An Australian residen

    • A foreign resident who operates an Australian permanent establishment (PE)

The CbC-reporting parent must be either a constitutional corporation or a partnership whose partners are constitutional corporations or a trust of which all trustees are a constitutional corporation. A constitutional corporation includes an Australian or foreign corporation.

The lodgment obligation applies to the CbC-reporting parent (i.e., the global parent entity in most instances) regardless of whether that entity is Australian or foreign. The explanatory memorandum (EM) to the Bill makes clear that the Bill is intended to apply to Australian groups with no foreign activities.

Definitions of CbC-reporting parents and CbC-reporting groups come from the existing law for the confidential subdivision 815-E ITAA Income Tax Assessment 1997 CbCR rules. The definitions widen the application of the rules, including to a "notional listed company group," and require careful consideration.

The requirements continue to apply to entities that are below the CbCR threshold in their home jurisdiction, but above the Australian threshold. Accordingly, some organizations that do not currently have any CbCR requirements anywhere in the world will have to prepare all information from scratch. There may be administrative guidance issued by the ATO on this matter.

De minimis exception

Reporting only applies to groups that have more than AU$10m in Australia-sourced income as part of their aggregated turnover for the current year. Australian-sourced income is not defined in the tax law; therefore, a facts-and-circumstances analysis of the income of group entities and relevant evidence will be required to claim the exception. The calculation of aggregated turnover includes the annual turnover of the entity and its connected entities and affiliates with various exclusions.

Exemptions

The legislation allows the Commissioner to exempt classes of entities, as well as specific entities, from providing some or all information. The law also allows for government entities to be exempted in some circumstances (as such, entities may be subject to alternative government disclosure or accountability regimes).

The EM includes new guidance on when it may be appropriate for the Commissioner to grant exceptions, including where information disclosure would breach Australian or foreign laws or reveal commercially sensitive information.

Importantly the exemption will only apply to a single period and groups will need to reapply for further exemptions each year.

The ATO will need to develop guidance on how groups can apply for exemptions and in what circumstances they may be granted.

Reporting requirements

The reporting requirements are:

  • The CbC-reporting parent is required to publish general information including a description of the group's approach to tax.
  • For Australia and each specified jurisdiction in which the CbC-reporting group operates, the CbC-reporting parent must publish, at a group level, certain information (set out in the table below).
  • For other non-specified jurisdictions, the CbC-reporting parent has the choice of publishing the same information for all jurisdictions or publishing slightly reduced information on an aggregated basis for all non-specified jurisdictions.
Specified jurisdictions list

A draft instrument, issued in February 2024, includes a list of 41 specified jurisdictions, which the draft EM stated were selected because they are typically associated with tax incentives, tax secrecy and other matters likely to facilitate profit-shifting activities. The list also broadly aligns with the list of jurisdictions covered by the International Dealings Schedule to the company income tax return.

The list includes various "tax havens," as well as some main trading partners, such as Hong Kong, Singapore and Switzerland. The list excludes Cyprus, Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands as they are in the EU and may be subject to the EU PCbCR.

A final instrument list is not expected until after the law is enacted. While comments in the EM to the Bill list some additional factors which will be considered in finalizing the list, the list is not expected to change substantially from the draft.

The specified jurisdictions overlap to a certain extent with the EU Annex I (black) and Annex II (grey) lists (e.g., a number of "tax havens" are on both lists), but there are also differences. For instance, Hong Kong, Singapore and Switzerland only appear on the Australian PCbCR list and other countries, such as the Russian Federation, only appear on the EU lists.

(The full draft list of specified jurisdictions is set out in the appendices at the end of this Alert.

Source of data and interpretation

Quantitative data must be sourced from audited consolidated financial accounts of the CbC parent for the reporting period or, if none exist, from equivalent statements that would have been prepared had it been a listed company.

All entities and branch operations (PEs) in a jurisdiction are combined.

The Bill makes clear that the information to be disclosed (other than names):

  • Must be identified so as to "best achieve consistency" with disclosures required in the global reporting initiative standard GRI-207: Tax 2019 disclosures in sections GRI 207-1 and 4 (use as primary source of guidance — the disclosures are intended to align with the meaning of those in the GRI 207, even where the terminology is not identical and take precedence over any Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidance)
  • Must have regard to the OECD transfer pricing guidelines (2022), OECD Guidance on the Implementation of Country-by-Country Reporting: BEPS Action 13 2022 version (use to provide greater detail on interpretation of particular terms) and any further documents prescribed by regulation

The full list of disclosures is below.

Additional requirements may be added by regulation (e.g., if an additional requirement was added to the GRI 207 standard).

Some key disclosure issues
  • The "approach to tax" is to be prepared based on the guidance set out in the voluntary accounting standard GRI 207-1. The approach to tax is to be defined at a group level — covering all relevant jurisdictions — which will require a consolidated assessment and formal descriptions of how all entities within the MNE approach tax. For MNEs that already voluntarily follow GRI 207-1, this will be straightforward. However, for MNEs that do not currently publish a formalized tax governance framework, the approach to tax will need to be formalized and reviewed from a stakeholder perspective.
  • Many companies will not have an existing obligation to produce information on revenue from related parties that are not tax residents of the jurisdiction, as the companies have not adopted the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standard and will therefore not have a process in place to gather and produce this information.
  • Providing an explanation of the difference between tax accrued and profit before tax multiplied by the country tax rate is likely to be a complex process.
  • Note the EM still lists an additional requirement to publish a link to the CbC-reporting group's EU PCbCR reporting. However, this requirement is not evident in the Bill.
Penalties

Two sets of penalties may apply for failure to comply with the new disclosure requirements. The ATO will likely provide guidance in due course concerning how they will seek to apply these penalties and any circumstances where they might be remitted.

On a prima facie basis, the penalties apply to the CbC-reporting parent. There is some uncertainty how the ATO will seek to collect penalties from CbC-reporting parents that do not have a direct presence in Australia and ATO guidance is expected.

Failure to lodge on-time penalties

A new specific penalty provision applies for providing the PCbCR information late. The penalties are 500 penalty units (AU$165,000 at proposed new rate of $330 per penalty unit3) per part of 28 days late up to a cap of 2,500 penalty units (AU$825,000 at proposed new rate). These penalties also apply if material errors are not reported to the Commissioner for correction within the required 28 days.

Failure to comply with requirements under a taxation law

The Bill introduces new paragraph 8C(1)(ab) into the Taxation Administration Act 1953 that makes failure to publish the required PCbCR disclosures in the prescribed manner a criminal offence.

Conviction would require the Commissioner of Taxation to prosecute in court and carries a maximum fine of 20 penalty units for a first-time offender (AU$6,600 at proposed new penalty unit rate), up to 50 penalty units (AU$16,500 at proposed new rate) for a third-time offender. Note that criminal penalties also may be imposed for third-time offences.

Managing stakeholders and disclosures

There is currently no provision for additional voluntary disclosures that may be needed to help readers understand the information published; for example, the reasons why a particular jurisdiction may appear to have a low tax burden may not be apparent from what the ATO publishes (e.g., from carryforward tax losses, home-country controlled foreign company (CFC) or Pillar Two pickup elsewhere). Groups may therefore want to consider their own additional forms of contemporaneous disclosure to better inform stakeholders.

Reporting entities should expect scrutiny of their PCbCR by the public, media and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) — including comparisons of various PCbCR lodgments and other public financial information looking for inconsistencies. As a result, it will be critical for covered entities to take a coordinated approach to their PCbCR requirements across jurisdictions.

Next steps

The Bill is in the Senate, which next sits from 12 August to 22 August 2024. It is unclear when the Bill might be passed and there is a risk that passage could be delayed by concerns with other unrelated proposals in the Bill. Notwithstanding the SELC's recommendations, further amendments can still be made before the law is enacted.

Given the far-reaching effects, including the extraterritorial effect and the significant additional requirements, groups should start preparing for the new rules based on the current Bill.

Appendices

For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:

Ernst & Young (Australia), Sydney
  • Danielle Donovan, Transfer Pricing
  • Karol Fernandez, Transfer Pricing
  • Jason Vella, Transfer Pricing
  • Jarrod Thomas, Transfer Pricing
  • Rose Wen, Transfer Pricing
  • Jesper Solgaard, Transfer Pricing
  • Fiona Moore, Tax Controversy
  • Alf Capito, Tax Policy
  • Craig Jackson, Tax Controversy
  • Remali Vilathgamuwa, Tax Controversy
  • Emily Marsden, Tax Controversy
Ernst & Young (Australia), Melbourne
  • Jean Paul Donga, Transfer Pricing
  • Jessica Uchida, Transfer Pricing
  • Tony Merlo, Tax Policy
Ernst & Young (Australia), Adelaide
  • Michelle Fardone, Transfer Pricing
  • Mitch Cramey, Transfer Pricing
Ernst & Young (Australia), Perth
  • Joe Lawson, Transfer Pricing
  • Caroline Walker, Transfer Pricing
Ernst & Young (Australia), Brisbane
  • Kevin Griffiths, Transfer Pricing
  • Andrew Christy, Transfer Pricing
Australia Tax Desk, New York, Ernst & Young LLP (United States)
  • Naomi Ross, International Tax and Transaction Services
Australia Tax Desk, London, Ernst & Young LLP (United Kingdom)
  • James Poulos, International Tax and Transaction Services

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor

For a full listing of contacts and email addresses, please click on the Tax News Update: Global Edition (GTNU) version of this Alert.