The impact of monetary policy tightening is yet to be fully felt
The effects of interest rate hikes are delayed by between four and eight quarters and as a result their maximum impact will materialize only next year. Debt servicing costs will continue to go up as an increasing share of debt is refinanced at elevated rates. As inflation falls and nominal rates stay unchanged, real rates will continue increasing, resulting in effective policy tightening. That said, the effects of monetary policy vary across countries, not least due to differences in the level of indebtedness and the popularity of fixed rate loans.
The effects of rising interest rates have become apparent in negative credit growth which has been impacted not only by high interest rates, but also tightening credit conditions. The real estate sector is particularly vulnerable to monetary policy tightening, as evidenced by a strong contraction in commercial real estate activity. Housing starts have also declined, while house prices have stabilised in nominal terms following rapid rises during the pandemic, but have fallen in real terms.
A major talking point in financial markets recently has been a significant rise in bond yields, though in Europe they have increased less than in the US. Yields have rallied both at shorter maturities, with markets pricing in that central bank rates will stay higher for longer, and at the long end. The latter has resulted both from the repricing of natural interest rates (i.e., interest rates in long-run equilibrium) and an increase in term premia, which may be related to the expectation of a permanently more expansionary fiscal policy and higher supply of government bonds. While the increase in the risk premium component may be warranted, we do not think that natural interest rates have permanently increased (considering demographic developments, for example, which support a further decline in natural rates). As a consequence, we expect bond yields to decline in the medium term.
While we estimate that the impact of the recent increase in bond yields on the European economy is likely to be very limited (less than 0.1% of GDP), tighter financial conditions reduce the likelihood of further rate hikes (especially in the US) and, if sustained, may support an earlier policy easing.
The balance of risks continues to lean to the downside
The economic outlook remains highly uncertain, with the balance of risks continuing to lean towards lower GDP growth and higher inflation.
Geopolitical tensions have again come to the forefront as the key source of risk, with the eruption of the Israel-Hamas conflict. At the current stage, the effects of the conflict on the European and global economy are likely to be very limited (less than 0.1% of GDP) and come mostly in the form of increased volatility in oil prices and in broader financial markets. However, should the conflict escalate throughout the Middle East, it could lead to a spike in oil prices, supply chain disturbances and a tightening of financial conditions. In addition, the war in Ukraine and potential China-Taiwan tensions continue to be important sources of risk for the global economic outlook.
Energy and food prices are also likely to be volatile, remaining a key source of risk for the inflation and growth outlook. While natural gas storage levels in Europe are very high, thereby reducing the short-term energy security risk, Europe remains vulnerable to energy shocks as gas imports remain fragile and the increase in renewable energy sources makes energy supply more unpredictable. Under these circumstances, any significant shock to supply or demand for energy, such as a total cessation of supply from Russia, a reduction in imports from the Middle East or a harsh winter will still have a substantial impact on prices, even if more limited than at the peak of the energy crisis last year.
Our analysis shows that Europe is more vulnerable to a renewed increase in energy prices than other major economies, in particular the US. In the event of another spike in oil, gas, and coal prices, potentially caused by an escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, CEE and Baltic countries would be most adversely affected in terms of both GDP and inflation. The GDP decline would likely be most significant in Czechia, Hungary and Slovakia, while Poland, Latvia and Slovakia would see the strongest increase in inflation. Southern and Nordic countries would be affected less, though still more than the US.