Man playing Jenga

Banking Recovery and Resolution Matters - Newsletter 3

EY Malta is delighted to share its quarterly Banking Recovery and Resolution Newsletter for Q2 2022. In this newsletter, we will be providing a snapshot of publications, updates to legislation and consultations issued in the last quarter around the banking recovery and resolution framework.                                                                                                                      

This newsletter provides a high-level overview of the publications issued by the different EU and local stakeholders and bodies dealing with recovery and resolution matters, in the second quarter of 2022.

Easy access to corporate information for investors: Council agrees its position on the European Single Access Point

On 29 June 2022, the Council agreed its position on three proposals creating the European Single Access Point (ESAP), which is the first action in the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan. This action aims at creating a single point of access to public financial and sustainability-related information about EU companies and EU investment products. Free, user friendly, centralised and digital access to financial and sustainability-related information made public by European companies, including small companies, will facilitate the decision-making process for a broad range of investors, including retail investors. By increasing the circulation of information, including across borders, and by increasing the digital use of that information, ESAP will further foster the integration of financial services and capital markets within the Union and help achieving the objectives of the Digital Finance Strategy.

This proposal does not impose any additional information reporting requirements on European companies, as ESAP will provide access to information already made public in application of the relevant European directives and regulations. Sustainability information will be made available early on ESAP, supporting the objectives of the European Green Deal. In its position, the Council designs a gradual phasing in of the ESAP platform to allow for a robust implementation. Based on coherent phases this phasing-in will ensure that European regulations and directives will in accordance with their priority enter into the scope of ESAP between 2026 and 2030. This ensures that sufficient time is available to define and implement the required technical aspects of the project.

The Council position also provides for a regular assessment of ESAP’s functioning and a review clause that should guarantee the adequacy of the platform to the needs of its users and its technical efficiency. To ensure the most efficient organisation at member states level, the Council’s position also provides for maximum flexibility to organise the collection of information in member states and relies on already existing schemes, in order to limit costs of adaptation for national authorities and reporting entities.

The proposals may be accessed through the following links:

  • Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and off the Council amending certain Regulations as regards the establishment and functioning of the European single access point; and
  • Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and off the Council amending certain Directives as regards the establishment and functioning of the European single access point.

SRB publishes its Annual Report for 2021

On 27 June 2022, the Single Resolution Board (SRB) published its Annual Report for 2021.

The report details the work of Europe’s SRB and highlights the progress made in making Europe’s banking sector more stable, by ensuring all of the SRB’s banks are resolvable.

The SRB focused on areas such as implementing the Banking Recovery and Resolution Directive II (BRRD2), continuing to build the SRF and the continued monitoring of banks, given the context of the pandemic. The SRB also worked on crisis readiness and fine-tuning existing resolution plans.

The SRB’s Annual Report 2021 may be accessed through this link.

SRB’s request for Resolution Reporting

In 2021 the SRB made a request to banks for resolution reports, in line with Article 11(1) of the BRRD, with the aim of collecting information for drawing up and implementing resolution plans, including calibrating Minimum Required Eligible Liabilities (MREL) targets from 120 banking groups in scope of the exercise.

For 2022, the SRB once again highlights the importance of high quality, complete and timely data submissions. The ability to provide the necessary data to support the implementation of the resolution strategy, is a key resolvability issue, to be adequately considered by banks’ top management. To ensure banks meet the reporting deadlines, the SRB recommended that all banks implement the following measures:

  1. To support high quality and complete data, the resolution reports should be submitted in line with the published guidance, with validation checks performed by the bank ensuring, among others, reconciliation with its FINREP and COREP regulatory reports (where applicable); and
  2. Banks should ensure that they have the necessary IT processes in place to facilitate a timely, controlled and robust reporting process generating consistent and reliable results.

Data quality and availability on time are key items to consider within the resolvability assessment. In this context, the SRB can consider the failure to comply with the information requirements as an impediment to resolvability, potentially significant. It is therefore important that the quality of and deadlines for the resolution reporting submissions are respected.

The scope of the reports has evolved to reflect the needs of resolution planning, while limiting the burden of reporting for banks. Nevertheless, the SRB retains the flexibility to request additional information wherever and whenever it deems necessary to do so.

As concerns the reporting perimeters, (Sub)-Consolidated views are based on the prudential or resolution scopes of consolidation, whereas Resolution Groups are to be defined by Internal Resolution Teams, in collaboration with the respective institutions.

Further information on reporting timelines, requirements and data quality may be accessed through this link.

SRB publishes updated Operationalisation Bail-In Guidance and consultations

Operationalisation Bail-In Guidance

On 15 June 2022, the SRB published its updated operational guidance to banks on the implementation of the bail-in tool, which enables the write-down or conversion of debt owed by a bank to creditors in resolution. The set of documents adds operational guidance to the SRB’s Expectations for Banks, which outlines the responsibilities of banks in making themselves resolvable.

These documents include updated guidance on bail-in playbooksbail-in data set instructions and an explanatory note on the latter. This guidance compiles the main elements that banks are expected to consider for enhancing their bail-in playbooks and the operationalisation of the bail-in tool in resolution.

Compared to the guidance published in August 2020, the documents add more detail to the expectations related to intra-group loss transfer and recapitalisation mechanisms between the resolution entity and its subsidiaries, as well as the required Management Information Systems (MIS) capabilities.

It further introduces a dedicated section on the testing of bail-in playbooks and MIS capabilities by banks and includes targeted amendments based on the SRB’s experience in this area since August 2020.

The operational guidance, updated by the SRB together with national resolution authorities, takes feedback from banks and lessons learned in crisis simulation exercises into account.

The guidance may be accessed through this link.

Consultation

On 07 June 2022, the European Banking Authority (EBA) launched a public consultation on its draft Guidelines addressed to national resolution authorities (NRAs) for the publication of their approach to implementing the bail-in tool. The Guidelines aim to ensure that a minimum level of harmonised information is made public with regard to the mechanics underpinning the execution of the bail-in tool. The consultation runs until 7 September 2022. 

Transparency and predictability are key, both to the credibility of the resolution framework, and to the safeguard of investors’ protection. Practices by institutions and authorities differ with regard to the publication of information on how they would effectively execute the write down and conversion of capital instruments and the use of the bail-in tool (“exchange mechanic”). 

All NRAs that have not yet published their bail-in mechanic are expected to start publishing a high-level document from January 2024 setting out the key aspects of their preferred approach. In particular, they should indicate whether they intend to make use of interim instruments.   All the NRAs that have already published such information are expected to check if their publication complies with the EBA draft Guidelines.  

The Consultation Guidelines may be accessed through this link.

SRB publishes updated 2022 MREL policy

On 08 June 2022, the SRB published its updated approach to setting a MREL. The policy has been revised based on experience gained and stakeholder feedback and applies to the 2022 resolution planning cycle.

The policy takes into account new regulatory developments, such as the end of the supervisory leverage relief measures of the European Central Bank (ECB), as well as changes to the Capital Requirement Regulation (CRR) recently agreed by the EU co-legislators on the indirect holding of internal MREL (iMREL) and the MREL calibration for banks with a multiple point-of-entry resolution strategy. 

The policy has also further enlarged the coverage of entities under internal MREL and made the subordination policy more dynamic, taking into account evolving balance sheets prior to resolution. It also complements the SRB approach to internal MREL waiver applications in a new annex.

Given the limited nature of the changes, the SRB also publishes a version in track changes to show the updated sections clearly.

This policy may be accessed through the links below:

EBA consults on sale of NPLs

On 16 May 2022, the EBA launched a public consultation on the draft Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) specifying the requirements for the information that sellers of non-performing loans (NPL) shall provide to prospective buyers, seeking to improve the functioning of NPL secondary markets. The objective of the draft ITS is to provide a common standard for the NPL transactions across the EU enabling cross-country comparison and thus reducing information asymmetries between the sellers and buyers of NPL.

Article 16(1) of the Directive on credit servicers and credit purchasers (Directive (EU) 2021/2167)  mandates the EBA to develop draft ITS to specify the templates to be used by credit institutions for the provision of information to credit purchasers when selling or transferring NPLs for the purposes of financial due diligence and valuation of NPLs.

Common templates, including data fields with their definitions and characteristics set out in the draft ITS would facilitate the sales of NPL on secondary markets, increase efficiency of those markets and reduce entry barriers for small credit institutions and smaller investors wishing to conclude transactions.

The draft ITS are built around the templates to be used for the provision of loan-by-loan information regarding counterparties related to NPL, contractual characteristics of the loan itself, any collateral and guarantee provided with the associated enforcement procedures and the historical collection and repayment schedule of the loan. The NPL transaction templates are also complemented by a data glossary and the instructions for filling in the templates.

The draft ITS also take into account the proportionality principle by setting different information requirements depending on the size of NPL, specifying the mandatory and non-mandatory data fields, and considering a different scope of application of the data fields in relation to the nature of the borrower (private individual or corporate), and that of the loan (secured or not).

The EBA has developed the draft ITS leveraging on the experience gained with the voluntary use of the NPL data templates, which it had developed in 2017 and reflecting the industry feedback on the use of these templates and wider market practices. The EBA collected these experiences while developing the discussion paper that was published in May 2021.

Deadline for submission of feedback for this consultation is by 31 August 2022.

More information on this consultation may be accessed through this link.

EBA updates its Guidelines for assessing equivalence of professional secrecy regimes of third country authorities

On 03 May 2022, the EBA published its updated Guidelines for assessing equivalence of professional secrecy and confidentiality regimes of third country authorities, to widen the scope and the purpose of the assessment.

During the past years, the EBA supported EU Competent Authorities with the assessment of professional secrecy regimes of third country authorities to facilitate their participation in EU supervisory colleges, in accordance with Article 116(6) of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).

The EBA Regulation also expressly entrusts the EBA with the task of monitoring third country regulatory and supervisory frameworks and establishes a closer link between equivalence and cooperation with authorities from equivalent third countries through cooperation arrangements. Similarly, provisions in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), the revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2), the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and the Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD) all provide for the possibility for EU authorities to sign cooperation arrangements with authorities from third countries. 

In view of that, the EBA has updated its Guidelines on equivalence of confidentiality regime of third countries, to allow for:

  • a wider scope of the assessment, that is, to include all relevant provisions in the CRD, PSD2, BRRD and AMLD, as applicable to the specific third country authorities);
  • a wider purpose, that is, to support cooperation arrangements and facilitate participation in supervisory, resolution and AML colleges.

In addition, the EBA has also updated the document showing how the principles that govern the EU confidentiality regime are reflected in the EU framework as defined by the relevant provisions in the CRD, BRRD, AMLD and PSD2.

More information may be obtained through the following links:

SRB publishes MREL dashboard Q4.2021

On 28 April 2022, the SRB issued the MREL dashboards for Quarter 4 of 2021

The MREL dashboards are based on bank data reported to the SRB and cover entities under SRB’s remit. The first section of the dashboard focuses on the evolution of MREL targets for resolution entities and non-resolution entities, outstanding stock and shortfalls in Q3.2021 under the BRRD II framework. It also includes an overview of gross issuances of MREL instruments during the last quarter. The second section highlights recent developments in the cost of funding. The main data issued under this MREL dashboards include the following:

MREL monitoring Q4.2021

  1. MREL final targets for resolution entities
  2. MREL outstanding stock of resolution entities
  3. Shortfalls of resolution entities
  4. MREL targets and shortfalls of non-resolution entities

Market activity and cost of funding

  1. Market access and MREL issuances
  2. Cost of Funding

Key findings are included hereunder:

  • In percentage of the total risk exposure amount (TREA), the average MREL final target, including the combined buffer requirement (CBR) for resolution entities, to be respected by 1 January 2024, stood at 26.2% TREA, growing marginally from Q3.2021.
  • The average MREL shortfall to the final 2024 targets including the CBR reached 0.45% TREA (or EUR 32.6 bn) for resolution entities, continuing the decreasing trend observed in the previous quarter, yet at a slower pace.
  • For non-resolution entities, the average MREL shortfall (including the CBR) against the final target halved with respect to Q3.2021 and amounted to 1.06% TREA (or EUR 22 bn).
  • As concerns MREL intermediate 2022 targets (including CBR), almost all banks resulted compliant. The very few ones in shortfall are closely monitored.
  • Banks’ issuance increased by 42.1% over the quarter and amounted to EUR 60.9 bn.  
  • MREL funding costs deteriorated in the first quarter, in light of rising geopolitical risks and elevated energy and oil prices, as well as inflationary pressures.

The press release and the MREL dashboards may be accessed through this link.

SRB Resolution Planning Booklet

On 22 April 2022, the SRB issued the Resolution Planning Booklet.

Resolution planning

Resolution planning is about being prepared to deal with failing banks in a controlled way, in order to protect taxpayers and keep providing critical functions to the economy while preserving financial stability.

To safeguard the resolution objectives, the resolution plans are updated on an annual basis taking into account changes in the market and in banks themselves, to make sure that there are ready-to-go plans that can be immediately operational if needed.

The resolution planning cycle (RPC) aligns the resolution planning of the banks under the SRB remit on the same 12-month cycle running from April to March.

The booklet informs stakeholders about the SRB’s resolution planning activities and describes the main processes and phases of the current Resolution Planning Cycle.

Approach in 2022

The below are some policy implementation milestones in 2022:

  • Updating the SRB polices and operational guidance documents, among others, taking into account the experience gained
  • Conducting close monitoring of resolvability and preparation of the substantive impediments procedure for those banks which show insufficient progress towards achieving resolvability in line with the EfB.
  • Conducting ongoing MREL monitoring to ensure build-up towards the final targets by the 1 January 2024 general deadline, as well as monitoring the 2022 intermediate targets.
  • To further develop deep-dive assessments, paving the way for conducting future on-site inspections.
  • Start of the preparation of the 2023 RPC, taking into account that 2023 is the final year for all SRB banks to be fully resolvable, in line with the Expectations for Banks (EfB); banks will receive bank-specific 2023 SRB priority letters in September 2022.

The Resolution Planning Booklet may be accessed through this link.

EBA Quantitative MREL Report

On 22 April 2022, the EBA published its annual Report on minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL). The Report shows progress in closing MREL shortfalls, as of December 2020, which was mostly driven by largest institutions while smaller institutions lagged somewhat behind.

In particular, the Report highlights that 110 resolution groups presented a shortfall of EUR 67.6bn against their end-state MREL targets, set for January 2024 for most of them. This is down from EUR115bn as of December 2019 on a comparable basis. The shortfall for other banks and other systemically important institutions (OSIIs) below EUR50bn is, however, largely stable at EUR30bn. Smaller banks’ lesser progress in closing their shortfall is partly due to the fact that in several jurisdictions their MREL decisions were issued in 2018 or 2019.

With regards to the intermediate target of January 2022, the shortfall was limited. As of December 2020, all global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) had already met their intermediary target and only 38 out of 260 resolution groups (18 O-SIIs and 20 other banks) had a shortfall of EUR 13.3bn (EUR 10.2bn for O-SIIs and EUR 3.1bn for other banks).

With regards to internal MREL – which allows the down-streaming of loss absorbing capacity from the parent entity to subsidiaries - authorities had made good progress with 128 decisions received by the EBA in the first year of the implementation of the revised Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD II), covering 73% of risk-weighted assets expected to receive internal MREL decisions in steady state. 62 non-resolution groups out of a sample of 128 presented an internal MREL shortfall of EUR 36bn.

This EBA report may be accessed through this link.

Contact us

Karl Mercieca
EY Malta Financial Services Regulatory Compliance
Partner 
karl.mercieca@mt.ey.com

Karl Mercieca

Maria Calleja
EY Malta Financial Services Regulatory Compliance
Manager
maria.calleja@mt.ey.com

Maria Calleja