The survey also finds that TMT companies are struggling to meet capital investment objectives. Sixty-three percent of all respondents fail to achieve forecast returns, while 66% agree that costs of their capital programs escalate as timeframes lapse. When it comes to measuring success, 70% of “laggard” respondents (58% of “leaders”) struggle to demonstrate the value their capital investments bring to the business – in large part due to data maturity limitations.
Agility is a top priority
Eighty-three percent of all respondents say the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the imperative to establish more agile mechanisms for allocating capital. Yet, a third (33%) believe they are still unable to flex to changing market conditions – including major events like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Telecoms companies have the biggest opportunity to improve agility, with 42% of telcos admitting that their approach to capital investment planning is too static and rigid (compared to 38% for media and entertainment companies and just 25% of tech companies). However, at the same time, telcos are the least likely to regularly review and adjust investments (16% compared to 26% of tech and 31% of media and entertainment companies). Furthermore, 38% of telcos struggle to find sufficient data to add credibility to the decision-making process – notably higher than media and entertainment (30%) and tech (28%) respondents.
Talent agenda must keep pace with tech transformation
The survey impresses the importance of cultivating the right skill sets to optimize capital investment, beyond tools and processes alone. Eighty-nine percent of “leaders” (67% of “laggards”) believe they will derive a competitive advantage by maintaining a highly skilled workforce that can manage capital projects.
But as the landscape shifts at pace, a skills gap is emerging as companies rollout new technologies without providing sufficient training to utilize them. According to the survey the top barrier to the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) analytics is the lack of AI skill sets, while two-thirds (66%) of all respondents say it is difficult to find the necessary skill sets within their organization today.
Spotlight on the ESG agenda
As TMT companies look to bolster governance and transparency processes, the survey outlines the importance of including environmental, social and governance (ESG) KPIs to facilitate holistic investments that deliver a more balanced set of objectives. The findings indicate that this should now be a key area of focus for TMT executives, with 62% of all respondents stating that not enough capital investment projects are assessed based on their contribution to environmental or sustainability goals.
***
About EY Romania
EY is one of the world's leading professional services firms with 312,250 employees in more than 700 offices across 150 countries, and revenues of approx. $40 billion in the financial year that ended on 30 June 2021. Our network is the most integrated worldwide, and its resources help us provide our clients with services allowing them to take advantage of opportunities anywhere in the world.
With a presence in Romania ever since 1992, EY is the leading company on the market of professional services. Our more than 800 employees in Romania and Moldova provide integrated services in assurance, tax, strategy and transactions, and consulting to clients ranging from multinationals to local companies.
Our offices are based in Bucharest, Cluj-Napoca, Timisoara, Iasi and Chisinau. In 2014, EY Romania joined the only global competition dedicated to entrepreneurship, EY Entrepreneur Of The Year. The winner of the national award represents Romania at the world final taking place every year in June, at Monte Carlo. The title of World Entrepreneur Of The Year is awarded in the world final. For more information, please visit: www.ey.com
About the EY Global Capital Operations and Innovation Study
Between March 2021 and April 2021, the EY organization surveyed 500 global TMT executives at companies with annual revenues of between US$250m and more than US$5b, to understand how they allocate and deploy capital.
Defining “leaders” and “laggards”: Respondents were presented with a scenario for each step of the capital life cycle and asked to select their level of maturity against how they: strategize and target; align and allocate; plan and forecast; execute and deploy; operate and maintain; and measure and optimize capital. Using statistical analytics, two clear segments of respondents were identified:
- Leaders (representing 60% of respondents): those with a propensity for consistent “and” / “or” enterprise-wide use of advanced tools, techniques and processes
- Laggards (representing 40% of respondents): those with more nascent capabilities