The CSRD: a multidisciplinary matter
The new Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which requires companies to report on their organization’s environmental and social impact, also brings new challenges, in particular because it concerns their entire supply chain / value chain. In addition to direct CO2 emissions from the organization’s own sources (scope 1), companies must also, for example, report indirect CO2 emissions from the purchase of electricity (scope 2). Finally, companies will also be required to report the CO2 emissions throughout the lifecycle of all the products they buy, manufactures and/or sell (scope 3). As a result, more and more information will have to be provided by suppliers and customers. Implementation requires a multidisciplinary approach, effective data management and technology, and that technology must also be scalable.
Basically, three matters have to be determined: what does the company need to report on, what information is already in its possession, and what information is missing? With regard to the first of these matters, a double materiality analysis needs to be performed (DMA). This involves identifying which sustainability themes affect the company (outside-in), and what impact the company’s business activities have on people and the environment (inside-out). This will force companies to put their finger on the problem, so to speak. The next step involves to set up the internal organization in a way that ensures the necessary data can be collected and the quality of data is adequate. This touches on strategy, policy, processes, internal controls, and IT and other systems.
Importantly, the implementation of the CSRD guidelines involves a change process in which companies must include their stakeholders in the value chain. In addition, under the CSRD companies must report on the due diligence program relating to their own business activities and those of the partners with whom they work. Companies must provide information on how they identify and mitigate risks relating to the environmental and human rights impact of their business activities and those of their long-term partners. In order to do this, companies need to expand the scope of their existing third-party risk management programmes. The good news is that the Horizon Europe programme offers opportunities for funding joint initiatives that contribute to European sustainability in the chain.
A business climate that is fit for purpose, and the war for talent
There have been many recent media reports about the growing pressure on the Dutch business climate and the uncertainty this entails for the business community. Trust, predictability and vision form the cornerstone of the business climate. Although the Dutch government has made initial investment commitments, uncertainty remains concerning broader financial and tax policies to support the high-tech industry on an ongoing basis, and this uncertainty is detrimental to the Netherlands’ own ‘Silicon Valley’. Senior executives in the Netherlands have been concerned about the business climate, and thinking about solutions, for a long time. The fact that the business community is unable to do this was also apparent from various roundtable discussions organized by EY last year, which were attended by dozens of CEOs and CFOs of Dutch listed companies, large family businesses and semi-public organizations. The influx of sufficient, highly qualified, talented people into the labor market is particularly important as a lifeline for the future, and this involves, among other things, increasing equal opportunities in education, encouraging young people to study STEM subjects, and ensuring a brain gain with regard to relevant specialist subjects (such as the sciences) in short supply in the Dutch labor market.